IMPROVED RESULTS ON POISSON PROCESS APPROXIMATION IN JACKSON NETWORKS

T. C. Brown, M. Fackrell, A. Xia
{"title":"IMPROVED RESULTS ON POISSON PROCESS APPROXIMATION IN JACKSON NETWORKS","authors":"T. C. Brown, M. Fackrell, A. Xia","doi":"10.1142/S0219607705000061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Melamed (1979) proved that for an open migration process, a necessary and sufficient condition for the equilibrium flow along a link to be Poissonian is the absence of loops: no customer can travel along the link more than once. Barbour and Brown (1996) quantified the statement by allowing the customers a small probability of travelling along the link more than once and proved Poisson process approximation theorems analogous to Melamed's Theorem. Amongst the three bounds presented in Barbour and Brown (1996), the one in terms of the Wasserstein metric is of particular interest since it reveals more insightful information about the closeness between the process of flows and an approximating Poisson process, and it is small when the parameter of the system is small, except a logarithmic factor in terms of time in which the flows are considered. The bound was later improved by Brown, Weinberg and Xia (2000) who showed that the logarithmic factor in terms of time can be lifted at the cost of an extra parameter being introduced into the bound. In this paper, we present a new bound which simplifies and sharpens the bounds in the above-mentioned two papers and compare the performance of these bounds for a simple open migration process.","PeriodicalId":80753,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin - Cosmos Club. Cosmos Club (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"77 1","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin - Cosmos Club. Cosmos Club (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219607705000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Melamed (1979) proved that for an open migration process, a necessary and sufficient condition for the equilibrium flow along a link to be Poissonian is the absence of loops: no customer can travel along the link more than once. Barbour and Brown (1996) quantified the statement by allowing the customers a small probability of travelling along the link more than once and proved Poisson process approximation theorems analogous to Melamed's Theorem. Amongst the three bounds presented in Barbour and Brown (1996), the one in terms of the Wasserstein metric is of particular interest since it reveals more insightful information about the closeness between the process of flows and an approximating Poisson process, and it is small when the parameter of the system is small, except a logarithmic factor in terms of time in which the flows are considered. The bound was later improved by Brown, Weinberg and Xia (2000) who showed that the logarithmic factor in terms of time can be lifted at the cost of an extra parameter being introduced into the bound. In this paper, we present a new bound which simplifies and sharpens the bounds in the above-mentioned two papers and compare the performance of these bounds for a simple open migration process.
Jackson网络泊松过程近似的改进结果
Melamed(1979)证明,对于一个开放的迁移过程,泊松平衡流动的必要和充分条件是不存在环路:没有客户可以沿着链路移动超过一次。Barbour和Brown(1996)量化了这一说法,允许顾客有很小的概率沿着链路旅行不止一次,并证明了类似于Melamed定理的泊松过程近似定理。在Barbour和Brown(1996)提出的三个界限中,Wasserstein度量的界限特别有趣,因为它揭示了关于流动过程与近似泊松过程之间的紧密性的更有洞察力的信息,并且当系统参数很小时,它很小,除了考虑流动的时间方面的对数因素。后来,Brown, Weinberg和Xia(2000)对该边界进行了改进,他们表明,在时间方面的对数因子可以被取消,代价是在边界中引入一个额外的参数。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的边界,简化和锐化了上述两篇论文中的边界,并比较了这些边界在一个简单开放迁移过程中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信