John Dewey and Citizen Politics: How Democracy Can Survive Artificial Intelligence and the Credo of Efficiency

Q2 Arts and Humanities
H. Boyte
{"title":"John Dewey and Citizen Politics: How Democracy Can Survive Artificial Intelligence and the Credo of Efficiency","authors":"H. Boyte","doi":"10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.2.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this essay, drawn from the 2017 Dewey lecture for the John Dewey Society, I argue that a positive response to the question raised by nine scientists in a Scientific American essay, \"Will Democracy Survive Big Data and Artificial Intelligence?\", February 25, 2017, requires a different kind of politics, citizen-centered, educative, productive, and empowering, as well as places to learn and practice such politics. Drawing on Dewey's 1902 speech, \"The School as Social Center,\" I suggest schools embedded in communities as potential \"free space\" for citizen politics which transforms the widespread sense of victimhood into civic agency. This kind of politics in community-embedded schools can counter what Robert Kanigel calls the \"Credo of Rational Efficiency\" that drives civic unravelling, growing powerlessness, and a Manichean politics, accelerated by Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Manichean politics is especially corrosive and disempowering and derives from the fact that hatred is the most efficient emotion to activate for cheap, quick political results. The essay details examples of citizen politics and signs of public interest in schools as free spaces.","PeriodicalId":37095,"journal":{"name":"Education and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.2.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract:In this essay, drawn from the 2017 Dewey lecture for the John Dewey Society, I argue that a positive response to the question raised by nine scientists in a Scientific American essay, "Will Democracy Survive Big Data and Artificial Intelligence?", February 25, 2017, requires a different kind of politics, citizen-centered, educative, productive, and empowering, as well as places to learn and practice such politics. Drawing on Dewey's 1902 speech, "The School as Social Center," I suggest schools embedded in communities as potential "free space" for citizen politics which transforms the widespread sense of victimhood into civic agency. This kind of politics in community-embedded schools can counter what Robert Kanigel calls the "Credo of Rational Efficiency" that drives civic unravelling, growing powerlessness, and a Manichean politics, accelerated by Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Manichean politics is especially corrosive and disempowering and derives from the fact that hatred is the most efficient emotion to activate for cheap, quick political results. The essay details examples of citizen politics and signs of public interest in schools as free spaces.
约翰·杜威与《公民政治:民主如何在人工智能和效率信条中生存》
摘要:本文摘自约翰·杜威学会(John Dewey Society) 2017年杜威讲座,笔者认为,要积极回应九位科学家在《科学美国人》(Scientific American) 2017年2月25日发表的一篇文章《民主能否在大数据和人工智能中生存?》中提出的问题,需要一种不同的、以公民为中心的、有教育意义的、有生产力的、赋权的政治,以及学习和实践这种政治的场所。根据杜威1902年的演讲“作为社会中心的学校”,我建议学校嵌入社区,作为公民政治的潜在“自由空间”,将普遍存在的受害者意识转变为公民代理。这种根植于社区学校的政治可以对抗罗伯特·卡尼格尔(Robert Kanigel)所说的“理性效率信条”(Credo of Rational Efficiency),这种信条导致了公民的解体、日益增强的无力感和摩尼教式的政治,而大数据和人工智能加速了这一趋势。摩尼教的政治尤其具有腐蚀性和削弱权力,它源于这样一个事实:仇恨是最有效的情绪,可以被激活,以获得廉价、快速的政治结果。这篇文章详细列举了公民政治和公共利益在学校作为自由空间的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education and Culture
Education and Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信