Trends in physiopathology research of primary headaches over the last 50 years

R. Arruda, C. Bordini
{"title":"Trends in physiopathology research of primary headaches over the last 50 years","authors":"R. Arruda, C. Bordini","doi":"10.48208/headachemed.2022.supplement.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nThe headache field, mainly migraine, is passing through a transformative era of new treatments. These breakthroughs would not be possible without the evolving knowledge on mechanisms of headaches. However, there are still unmet needs for headaches' understanding and treatments.\nObjectives\nAssess whether there is a trend in the number of publications regarding physiopathology of each primary headache disorders (PHD) in the past 50 years. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemics impacted on physiopathology research of PHD.\nMethods\nPHD were divided hierarchically in first- and second-digit, according to ICHD-3 criteria. PubMed database was searched using both the name of the PHD and MeSH terms related to physiopathology. Each search yielded the number of publications for a determined PHD along the period selected (1971-2021). Data were retrieved and separated in two groups: a) per decades (1971-2020); and b) per year (2011-2021). Ratios between every two timepoints in each group were calculated, as well as a total ratio for the whole interval.\nResults\nEither divided per decades, or divided annually for the last 10 years, migraine had the highest absolute number of pathophysiology publications, significantly above the other PHD.\nDivided per decades, with exception of tension-type headache (TTH), all the other PHD groups have increased their number of publications over time. Meanwhile, TTH in the last decade decreased the total number of mechanisms research.\nThe number of papers published in 2020 was lower than in 2019 for TTH, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) and group 4 \"other PHD\" (4.OPHD), migraine kept practically the same number.\nConclusion\nThere is a clear disparity in the number of publications on mechanisms of each PHD, being migraine well above TTH, TACs and 4.OPHD.\nAs expected, the recent COVID pandemics has clearly impaired pathophysiologic research in the headache field.\nKeywords: Headache, Migraine, Mechanisms, Physiopathology, Research.","PeriodicalId":12925,"journal":{"name":"Headache Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48208/headachemed.2022.supplement.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The headache field, mainly migraine, is passing through a transformative era of new treatments. These breakthroughs would not be possible without the evolving knowledge on mechanisms of headaches. However, there are still unmet needs for headaches' understanding and treatments. Objectives Assess whether there is a trend in the number of publications regarding physiopathology of each primary headache disorders (PHD) in the past 50 years. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemics impacted on physiopathology research of PHD. Methods PHD were divided hierarchically in first- and second-digit, according to ICHD-3 criteria. PubMed database was searched using both the name of the PHD and MeSH terms related to physiopathology. Each search yielded the number of publications for a determined PHD along the period selected (1971-2021). Data were retrieved and separated in two groups: a) per decades (1971-2020); and b) per year (2011-2021). Ratios between every two timepoints in each group were calculated, as well as a total ratio for the whole interval. Results Either divided per decades, or divided annually for the last 10 years, migraine had the highest absolute number of pathophysiology publications, significantly above the other PHD. Divided per decades, with exception of tension-type headache (TTH), all the other PHD groups have increased their number of publications over time. Meanwhile, TTH in the last decade decreased the total number of mechanisms research. The number of papers published in 2020 was lower than in 2019 for TTH, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) and group 4 "other PHD" (4.OPHD), migraine kept practically the same number. Conclusion There is a clear disparity in the number of publications on mechanisms of each PHD, being migraine well above TTH, TACs and 4.OPHD. As expected, the recent COVID pandemics has clearly impaired pathophysiologic research in the headache field. Keywords: Headache, Migraine, Mechanisms, Physiopathology, Research.
近50年来原发性头痛的生理病理研究趋势
头痛领域,主要是偏头痛,正在经历一个新的治疗变革的时代。如果没有关于头痛机制的不断发展的知识,这些突破是不可能实现的。然而,对头痛的认识和治疗仍有未满足的需求。目的评价在过去的50年里,关于各种原发性头痛疾病(PHD)的生理病理学的出版物数量是否有趋势。其次,我们旨在评估SARS-CoV-2大流行对博士生理病理研究的影响。方法根据ICHD-3标准,将sphd按一位数和二位数进行分级。检索PubMed数据库,同时使用与生理病理学相关的PHD名称和MeSH术语。每次检索都会产生在所选时期(1971-2021)内确定的博士论文发表数量。数据被检索并分为两组:a)每十年(1971-2020);b)每年(2011-2021年)。计算每组每两个时间点之间的比率,以及整个区间的总比率。结果无论是每十年划分,还是最近10年每年划分,偏头痛的病理生理学出版物的绝对数量最高,显著高于其他博士。每隔几十年,除了紧张性头痛(TTH)外,所有其他博士小组的出版物数量都随着时间的推移而增加。与此同时,近十年来的TTH减少了机理研究的总数。2020年TTH、三叉神经性自主脑痛(TACs)和第4组“其他博士”(4. ophd)的论文发表数量低于2019年,偏头痛的论文发表数量基本保持不变。结论各博士发病机制的发表数量存在明显差异,以偏头痛为主,远高于TTH、TACs和4.OPHD。正如预期的那样,最近的COVID大流行明显损害了头痛领域的病理生理学研究。关键词:头痛,偏头痛,机制,生理病理,研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信