Collaborative Bit and Reamer Design Solution for Performance Drilling in Salt and High Durability in Challenging Subsalt Interval in One Run, Deepwater Gulf of Mexico

K. Havard, B. Durairajan, S. Stith, S. Goyal, Philipp Trunk, M. Nagaraj, Dexter Trahan, Guillaume Descamps, M. Dykstra, Leonardo Louback, Marcus Norvell, C. Pinard, Youdan Zhang, Rob Rabei, M. Halpin
{"title":"Collaborative Bit and Reamer Design Solution for Performance Drilling in Salt and High Durability in Challenging Subsalt Interval in One Run, Deepwater Gulf of Mexico","authors":"K. Havard, B. Durairajan, S. Stith, S. Goyal, Philipp Trunk, M. Nagaraj, Dexter Trahan, Guillaume Descamps, M. Dykstra, Leonardo Louback, Marcus Norvell, C. Pinard, Youdan Zhang, Rob Rabei, M. Halpin","doi":"10.4043/29783-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This case study highlights the challenge of identifying the root cause of bit failures and provides an iterative design solution for maximizing drilling performance on a deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GoM) field development project. The well design and project economics required drilling through two distinct lithologies: salt followed by subsalt sediments consisting of plastic shale, abrasive sands, and marl. The operator wanted to drill through these in the same interval, in one run, while simultaneously achieving high rates of penetration (ROP) and maintaining durability for the entire interval.\n Offset wells from previous operations in the area provided an initial starting point for the design, despite being quite different from the new well plan. A new drill bit and reamer combination were developed and built for the first well. In addition, the bottomhole assembly (BHA) design was optimized and detailed drilling parameter roadmaps were provided for the field crew. When the first run resulted in a premature bit failure, an in-depth post-run analysis was completed. A rapid response root-cause analysis was conducted, which resulted in a new bit design and expedited manufacturing to deliver the new bit within the tight timeline between consecutive wells.\n Historical data from the Exploration &Appraisal (E&A) wells in the field indicated coring as the prevalent form of bit failure in the subsalt interval and loosely correlated with drilling of a middle Miocene sandstone. However, the wide range of bit vendors, bit sizes, and dull conditions in the data created uncertainty on root cause of failure. Although a good ROP was achieved in the salt section on the first field development well, the bit suffered premature wear in the subsalt interval, resulting in two additional trips to drill the interval. Each worn bit was thoroughly analyzed in conjunction with the drilling parameters and mud logging data from each bit run. Against the previous assumption of coring being a result of drilling abrasive sandstones, it was now determined that the failure mechanism was most likely a result of drilling shales with high bottomhole pressure causing plastic behavior, regrinding of cuttings at the bit face, and insufficient cuttings evacuation. An entirely new bit design was generated to prevent this failure mode and manufactured in time for the next well. The new bit design combined with revised drilling parameters strategy resulted in the most successful run ever in the field: 10,854 ft drilled (7,000 ft of reaming) in one run at high ROP in the salt followed by good ROP and excellent durability in subsalt formations.","PeriodicalId":11089,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 30, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29783-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study highlights the challenge of identifying the root cause of bit failures and provides an iterative design solution for maximizing drilling performance on a deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GoM) field development project. The well design and project economics required drilling through two distinct lithologies: salt followed by subsalt sediments consisting of plastic shale, abrasive sands, and marl. The operator wanted to drill through these in the same interval, in one run, while simultaneously achieving high rates of penetration (ROP) and maintaining durability for the entire interval. Offset wells from previous operations in the area provided an initial starting point for the design, despite being quite different from the new well plan. A new drill bit and reamer combination were developed and built for the first well. In addition, the bottomhole assembly (BHA) design was optimized and detailed drilling parameter roadmaps were provided for the field crew. When the first run resulted in a premature bit failure, an in-depth post-run analysis was completed. A rapid response root-cause analysis was conducted, which resulted in a new bit design and expedited manufacturing to deliver the new bit within the tight timeline between consecutive wells. Historical data from the Exploration &Appraisal (E&A) wells in the field indicated coring as the prevalent form of bit failure in the subsalt interval and loosely correlated with drilling of a middle Miocene sandstone. However, the wide range of bit vendors, bit sizes, and dull conditions in the data created uncertainty on root cause of failure. Although a good ROP was achieved in the salt section on the first field development well, the bit suffered premature wear in the subsalt interval, resulting in two additional trips to drill the interval. Each worn bit was thoroughly analyzed in conjunction with the drilling parameters and mud logging data from each bit run. Against the previous assumption of coring being a result of drilling abrasive sandstones, it was now determined that the failure mechanism was most likely a result of drilling shales with high bottomhole pressure causing plastic behavior, regrinding of cuttings at the bit face, and insufficient cuttings evacuation. An entirely new bit design was generated to prevent this failure mode and manufactured in time for the next well. The new bit design combined with revised drilling parameters strategy resulted in the most successful run ever in the field: 10,854 ft drilled (7,000 ft of reaming) in one run at high ROP in the salt followed by good ROP and excellent durability in subsalt formations.
钻头和扩眼器协同设计解决方案,可在墨西哥深水海湾的盐层中实现高性能钻井,并可在具有挑战性的盐下地层中一趟钻获得高耐久性
本案例研究强调了识别钻头失效的根本原因所面临的挑战,并为墨西哥湾(GoM)深水油田开发项目提供了一种迭代设计解决方案,以最大限度地提高钻井性能。井的设计和项目的经济效益需要钻透两种不同的岩性:盐层,其次是盐下沉积物,包括可塑页岩、磨砂和泥灰岩。作业者希望在同一段井段内一次钻完这些井段,同时实现高机械钻速(ROP)并保持整个井段的耐用性。该地区以前作业的邻井为设计提供了一个初始起点,尽管与新井计划有很大不同。为第一口井开发并制造了一种新的钻头和扩眼器组合。此外,还优化了底部钻具组合(BHA)设计,并为现场工作人员提供了详细的钻井参数路线图。当第一次下入导致钻头过早失效时,完成了深入的下入后分析。进行了快速响应的根本原因分析,从而设计了新的钻头,并加快了制造速度,在连续井之间的紧凑时间内交付了新钻头。现场勘探与评价井的历史数据表明,取心是盐下段钻头失效的主要形式,与中中新世砂岩的钻探具有松散的相关性。然而,不同的钻头供应商、不同的钻头尺寸以及数据中的模糊条件都导致了故障根本原因的不确定性。尽管在第一口油田开发井的盐段取得了良好的机械钻速,但钻头在盐下段出现了过早磨损,导致该段需要额外两次下钻。结合钻井参数和每次下入的泥浆测井数据,对每个磨损钻头进行了全面分析。与之前的假设相反,取心是由于钻井磨蚀性砂岩造成的,现在确定的破坏机制很可能是由于钻井页岩具有高井底压力导致的塑性行为、钻头表面岩屑的再磨以及岩屑排出不足造成的。为了防止这种失效模式,我们设计了一种全新的钻头,并及时制造了下一口井。新钻头设计与改进的钻井参数策略相结合,实现了该油田有史以来最成功的一次钻进:在盐层中以高机械钻速钻进了10854英尺(7000英尺),随后在盐下地层中获得了良好的机械钻速和优异的耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信