Academic librarians and systematic reviews: trends and services

Q3 Social Sciences

Public Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15228959.2022.2086664

Mark C. Scott, Brad Vogus

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Librarians outside the health and medical fields are offering systematic review services. Subject librarians in the social sciences, business, and management fields are seeing an increased interest from faculty and graduate students in performing and collaborating on systematic reviews. Librarians must obtain skills and explore new and different ways to interact and work in partnership with researchers to be successful in being part of the systematic review process.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术图书馆员和系统评论:趋势和服务

卫生和医学领域以外的图书馆员正在提供系统的评论服务。社会科学、商业和管理领域的学科图书馆员发现，教师和研究生对执行和合作进行系统评论的兴趣越来越大。图书馆员必须掌握技能，探索新的和不同的方式与研究人员互动和合作，才能成功地成为系统审查过程的一部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Public Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Public Services Quarterly covers a broad spectrum of public service issues in academic libraries, presenting practical strategies for implementing new initiatives and research-based insights into effective practices. The journal publishes research-based and theoretical articles as well as case studies that advance the understanding of public services, including reference and research assistance, information literacy instruction, access and delivery services, and other services to patrons. Articles may examine creative ways to use technology to assist students and faculty. Practice-based articles should be thoroughly grounded in the literature and should situate the work done in one library into the larger context of the situation.