Malawi’s Post-Independence Foreign Policy and Its Influence on Development Options

M. Chasukwa, H. Kayuni, Y. Msiska
{"title":"Malawi’s Post-Independence Foreign Policy and Its Influence on Development Options","authors":"M. Chasukwa, H. Kayuni, Y. Msiska","doi":"10.1163/2031356x-35020003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper analyses the causes, processes and systemic factors that have been central to Malawi’s post-independence foreign policy and its implications for national development policy options between 1964 and 1993. The paper argues that Malawi’s post-independence foreign policy and development direction were mainly adopted in reaction to the failure of Kamuzu Banda (the first president of Malawi) to win international support (at an Organisation of African Unity summit) for his quest to interact economically with more countries. From a historical institutionalist perspective, it can be argued that this rejection “carved out” a future foreign policy direction that was deliberately meant to “rebel” against the Organisation of African Unity’s prescriptions. Subsequent development policies (for instance, maintaining ties with Israel and the apartheid South African regime) were actually more of an aftermath of this “carved-out” foreign policy direction. In other words, foreign policy dictated the development policy options. The findings are drawn from available documentary sources (new and old) and a review of existing literature. Through a re-examination of the existing evidence in the context of historical institutionalism, it provokes and recasts a new and fascinating debate on Malawi’s post-independence foreign policy architecture.","PeriodicalId":32512,"journal":{"name":"Afrika Focus","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afrika Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2031356x-35020003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the causes, processes and systemic factors that have been central to Malawi’s post-independence foreign policy and its implications for national development policy options between 1964 and 1993. The paper argues that Malawi’s post-independence foreign policy and development direction were mainly adopted in reaction to the failure of Kamuzu Banda (the first president of Malawi) to win international support (at an Organisation of African Unity summit) for his quest to interact economically with more countries. From a historical institutionalist perspective, it can be argued that this rejection “carved out” a future foreign policy direction that was deliberately meant to “rebel” against the Organisation of African Unity’s prescriptions. Subsequent development policies (for instance, maintaining ties with Israel and the apartheid South African regime) were actually more of an aftermath of this “carved-out” foreign policy direction. In other words, foreign policy dictated the development policy options. The findings are drawn from available documentary sources (new and old) and a review of existing literature. Through a re-examination of the existing evidence in the context of historical institutionalism, it provokes and recasts a new and fascinating debate on Malawi’s post-independence foreign policy architecture.
马拉维独立后的外交政策及其对发展选择的影响
本文分析了马拉维独立后外交政策的核心原因、过程和系统因素及其对1964年至1993年期间国家发展政策选择的影响。这篇论文认为,马拉维独立后的外交政策和发展方向主要是对Kamuzu Banda(马拉维第一任总统)寻求与更多国家进行经济互动而未能赢得国际支持(在非洲统一组织峰会上)的反应。从历史制度主义的角度来看,可以说,这种拒绝“开辟”了未来外交政策的方向,这是故意“反叛”非洲统一组织的处方。随后的发展政策(例如,与以色列和种族隔离的南非政权保持联系)实际上更多的是这种“雕刻”外交政策方向的后果。换句话说,外交政策决定了发展政策的选择。调查结果来自现有的文献来源(新的和旧的)和对现有文献的审查。通过在历史制度主义背景下对现有证据的重新审视,它引发并重塑了一场关于马拉维独立后外交政策架构的新的、引人入胜的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信