Comparing the Performance Evaluation Models of Gas Refineries Using AHP and TOPSIS

Abstract

Background: To basically solve the critical environmental problems, macro and infrastructural perspectives of rational development should be designed following environmental protection rules. Creating the proper performance measurement systems in every organization has had a promising interest in university studies, and many researchers are working on it. Methods: This research intends to compare and rank 4 evaluation performance models used in gas refineries. To achieve the desired model in this study, we employed the grounded theory. The study research consisted of 20 professionals and Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) managers of gas refineries who had relevant experience and skills in this area. The normal score was estimated based on the weight obtained from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to apply the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) process and prioritize the models. Results: The pairwise comparison matrix of 4 research models of the balanced scoring card, European foundation for quality management business excellence model, Iran national quality award, and environmental performance evaluation depicted that the geometric mean of the evaluation criteria includes the following items: the capability to quantify qualitative data for environmental performance, facilitating, efficient implementing, structuring, and mapping a roadmap of organization maturity to select an environmental performance estimated at 1.22, 0.90, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively. Also, the normal weights of these four criteria are estimated at 0.3039423, 0.2242449, 0.2347026, and 0.2371102, respectively. Conclusion: The findings resulting from prioritizing the organization’s Environmental Performance Evaluation (EPE) models based on TOPSIS depicted that the suggested model with relative proximity to 99% is the first choice of EPE for the gas refinery.