Novel Empirical Approach to Supercharged Pressure Test Analysis

Steve Smith, H. Khairy, Chinwenwa Emma-Ebere, M. Ismail
{"title":"Novel Empirical Approach to Supercharged Pressure Test Analysis","authors":"Steve Smith, H. Khairy, Chinwenwa Emma-Ebere, M. Ismail","doi":"10.2118/194887-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Supercharged pressures exist when drilling fluid losses (spurt, dynamic and static) invade the near well-bore region and creates a ‘supercharged’ pressure zone that is higher than the reservoir pressure but lower than the wellbore hydrostatic pressure. Due to the overbalanced hydrostatic pressure the fluid invades but cannot be disbursed because of the low mobility of the rock. This creates a near well-bore region with pore pressures between hydrostatic (wellbore) and reservoir pressure. This typically occurs in low mobility formations where the dispersion of the invaded drilling fluids is not efficient. Determining true reservoir pore pressure in these conditions is difficult for formation pressure testing tools (FPT's) which measure elevated pressures above true reservoir pressure in these conditions. Analyzing the change in measured pressures from repeated tests using FPT's may help estimate the true formation pressure.\n \n \n \n One characteristic indication of supercharging is successive pressure build-up tests (after small drawdown volumes) that stabilize at lower pressures with each subsequent test as more supercharging fluid is removed from the near well-bore region. The successive decrease in build-up pressure as a function of volume can provide information on the dynamic pressure environment in the near wellbore zone and the reservoir pressures further from the wellbore. Plotting the pressure drop as a function of fluid volume removed from the formation and fitting an exponential decay curve to the data provides an estimate of the reservoir pressure. The curve is optimized using a regression algorithm to find a best match. Because one of the unknown variables is the desired formation pressure, a range of formation pressures are evaluated and a χ-squared error function is minimized, thus approximating the true reservoir pressure.\n \n \n \n Numerical simulation models with known formation pressures were set-up with a static supercharged near well-bore environment and various pressure tests were conducted. Analysis was performed on a number of tests to optimize the regression algorithm. The optimized regression provided an indication of the reservoir pressure within 2% of the simulated value. Real data examples were also analyzed with good results.\n \n \n \n This analysis technique provides a novel empirical method for estimating reservoir pressures in supercharged environments by investigating the change in build-up pressures in successive tests. The analysis can be accomplished with pressure measurement data from standard FPT's. Furthermore, the individual pressure tests do not need to stabilize because the change in pressure is used nor do the pressure tests need to measure the true reservoir pressure because it is determined by a regression analysis.\n","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194887-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supercharged pressures exist when drilling fluid losses (spurt, dynamic and static) invade the near well-bore region and creates a ‘supercharged’ pressure zone that is higher than the reservoir pressure but lower than the wellbore hydrostatic pressure. Due to the overbalanced hydrostatic pressure the fluid invades but cannot be disbursed because of the low mobility of the rock. This creates a near well-bore region with pore pressures between hydrostatic (wellbore) and reservoir pressure. This typically occurs in low mobility formations where the dispersion of the invaded drilling fluids is not efficient. Determining true reservoir pore pressure in these conditions is difficult for formation pressure testing tools (FPT's) which measure elevated pressures above true reservoir pressure in these conditions. Analyzing the change in measured pressures from repeated tests using FPT's may help estimate the true formation pressure. One characteristic indication of supercharging is successive pressure build-up tests (after small drawdown volumes) that stabilize at lower pressures with each subsequent test as more supercharging fluid is removed from the near well-bore region. The successive decrease in build-up pressure as a function of volume can provide information on the dynamic pressure environment in the near wellbore zone and the reservoir pressures further from the wellbore. Plotting the pressure drop as a function of fluid volume removed from the formation and fitting an exponential decay curve to the data provides an estimate of the reservoir pressure. The curve is optimized using a regression algorithm to find a best match. Because one of the unknown variables is the desired formation pressure, a range of formation pressures are evaluated and a χ-squared error function is minimized, thus approximating the true reservoir pressure. Numerical simulation models with known formation pressures were set-up with a static supercharged near well-bore environment and various pressure tests were conducted. Analysis was performed on a number of tests to optimize the regression algorithm. The optimized regression provided an indication of the reservoir pressure within 2% of the simulated value. Real data examples were also analyzed with good results. This analysis technique provides a novel empirical method for estimating reservoir pressures in supercharged environments by investigating the change in build-up pressures in successive tests. The analysis can be accomplished with pressure measurement data from standard FPT's. Furthermore, the individual pressure tests do not need to stabilize because the change in pressure is used nor do the pressure tests need to measure the true reservoir pressure because it is determined by a regression analysis.
增压压力试验分析的新经验方法
当钻井液漏失(喷射、动态和静态)侵入近井筒区域,形成一个高于油藏压力但低于井筒静水压力的“增压”压力区时,就会出现增压压力。由于静水压力过平衡,流体侵入,但由于岩石的低流动性而无法排出。这就形成了一个孔隙压力介于静水(井筒)和油藏压力之间的近井筒区域。这通常发生在低流动性地层中,在这种地层中,侵入钻井液的分散效率不高。在这些条件下,地层压力测试工具(FPT)很难确定储层的真实孔隙压力,因为FPT测量的压力高于储层的真实压力。利用FPT分析重复测试中测量压力的变化有助于估计真实地层压力。增压的一个特征是连续的压力累积测试(在小的压降量之后),随着越来越多的增压流体从近井眼区域移除,每次后续测试都能稳定在较低的压力下。堆积压力作为体积函数的连续下降可以提供近井区动态压力环境的信息,以及远离井筒的油藏压力。将压力降绘制为地层中流体体积的函数,并将指数衰减曲线拟合到数据中,从而估算出储层压力。使用回归算法对曲线进行优化以找到最佳匹配。由于其中一个未知变量是期望的地层压力,因此可以评估一系列地层压力,并最小化χ²误差函数,从而接近真实的油藏压力。在已知地层压力的情况下,在井筒附近的静态增压环境下建立了数值模拟模型,并进行了各种压力测试。对多个测试进行了分析,以优化回归算法。优化后的回归表明,油藏压力在模拟值的2%以内。并对实际数据实例进行了分析,取得了较好的结果。该分析技术提供了一种新的经验方法,通过研究连续测试中堆积压力的变化来估计增压环境下的储层压力。分析可以用标准FPT的压力测量数据来完成。此外,单独的压力测试不需要稳定,因为使用了压力变化,也不需要测量油藏的真实压力,因为它是通过回归分析确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信