Accuracy of straight leg raise and slump tests in detecting lumbar disc herniation: a pilot study.

V. M'kumbuzi, J. T. Ntawukuriryayo, J. D. Haminana, J. Munyandamutsa, E. Nzakizwanimana
{"title":"Accuracy of straight leg raise and slump tests in detecting lumbar disc herniation: a pilot study.","authors":"V. M'kumbuzi, J. T. Ntawukuriryayo, J. D. Haminana, J. Munyandamutsa, E. Nzakizwanimana","doi":"10.4314/CAJM.V58I1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the accuracy of the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) and slump tests in detecting Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH).\n\n\nDESIGN\nCross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.\n\n\nSETTING\nTwo referral hospitals in Kigali, Rwanda: King Faisal Hospital and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali.\n\n\nSUBJECTS\nAll patients aged 18 to 70 who had an MRI and who were experiencing pain in the low back, leg or low back and leg.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nClosed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) investigations for each patient as witnessed by a radiologist who read the image were recorded by the first researcher and blinded to other researchers. The SLR and slump tests were performed three times on each patient by independent testers who were blinded to the result of the first test. The test order was randomized for each subject and the two tests were separated by one day wash-out period.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\nData were analyzed using a 2x2 table to ascertain diagnostic statistics including sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThirty three from a possible 37 patients mean age 41.58 ± 10 years completed all of the tests. The sensitivity of SLR was greater (0.875; CI: 0.690-0.957) than that of the slump tests (0.800; CI: 0.6087-0.911) (p = 0.01) in detecting LDH. The specificity for SLR was 0.429 (CI: 0.158-0.750) and for slump was 0.714 (CI: 0.359-0.918). Substantial agreement (K = 0.774) was obtained between the SLR and MRI.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe SLR was more accurate in detecting LDH. Further validation of this pilot finding is required by studying a larger sample.","PeriodicalId":74979,"journal":{"name":"The Central African journal of medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Central African journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/CAJM.V58I1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy of the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) and slump tests in detecting Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH). DESIGN Cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING Two referral hospitals in Kigali, Rwanda: King Faisal Hospital and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali. SUBJECTS All patients aged 18 to 70 who had an MRI and who were experiencing pain in the low back, leg or low back and leg. INTERVENTIONS Closed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) investigations for each patient as witnessed by a radiologist who read the image were recorded by the first researcher and blinded to other researchers. The SLR and slump tests were performed three times on each patient by independent testers who were blinded to the result of the first test. The test order was randomized for each subject and the two tests were separated by one day wash-out period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Data were analyzed using a 2x2 table to ascertain diagnostic statistics including sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Thirty three from a possible 37 patients mean age 41.58 ± 10 years completed all of the tests. The sensitivity of SLR was greater (0.875; CI: 0.690-0.957) than that of the slump tests (0.800; CI: 0.6087-0.911) (p = 0.01) in detecting LDH. The specificity for SLR was 0.429 (CI: 0.158-0.750) and for slump was 0.714 (CI: 0.359-0.918). Substantial agreement (K = 0.774) was obtained between the SLR and MRI. CONCLUSION The SLR was more accurate in detecting LDH. Further validation of this pilot finding is required by studying a larger sample.
直腿抬高和坍落度检测腰椎间盘突出的准确性:一项初步研究。
目的探讨直腿抬高法(SLR)和坍落度法检测腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的准确性。设计横断面诊断准确性研究。卢旺达基加利有两家转诊医院:费萨尔国王医院和基加利大学医院中心。研究对象:所有年龄在18到70岁之间,做过核磁共振检查,腰背部、腿部或腰背部和腿部疼痛的患者。介入每位患者的闭式磁共振成像(MRI)调查由一名阅读图像的放射科医生见证,由第一名研究人员记录,并对其他研究人员保密。由独立测试人员对每位患者进行三次单反和坍落度测试,他们对第一次测试的结果不知情。每个受试者的测试顺序随机化,两次测试之间间隔一天的洗脱期。主要结局测量数据采用2x2表进行分析,以确定诊断统计数据,包括敏感性和特异性(95%置信区间)。结果37例患者中33例完成全部检查,平均年龄41.58±10岁。单反的灵敏度更高(0.875;CI: 0.690-0.957)比坍落度试验(0.800;CI: 0.6087 ~ 0.911) (p = 0.01)。SLR的特异性为0.429 (CI: 0.158 ~ 0.750),坍落度的特异性为0.714 (CI: 0.359 ~ 0.918)。SLR和MRI结果基本一致(K = 0.774)。结论单反法检测LDH具有较高的准确性。需要通过研究更大的样本来进一步验证这一初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信