Medicare in the 21st Century: Building a Better Chronic Care System

J. Eichner, D. Blumenthal
{"title":"Medicare in the 21st Century: Building a Better Chronic Care System","authors":"J. Eichner, D. Blumenthal","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.555632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report is about how Medicare could improve care for beneficiaries with chronic conditions. During the mid-1960s, acute care - not chronic care - was the major focus of medicine. When Medicare was instituted in 1965, it was modeled after the health insurance system of that time. Medicare was to function primarily as a claims payer; its benefit package and reimbursement systems were not designed for chronic conditions; preventive services were excluded; and reimbursement was paid only for in-person visits and procedures to individual providers. Since then, good chronic care and comprehensive coverage have become crucial to Medicare beneficiaries. Though some improvements have been made to Medicare, major changes in the provision and financing of chronic care for Medicare beneficiaries are needed. Medicare has the potential to refocus its Medicare program - as well as the nation's health care system - and should take a leading role in improving chronic care. This report is the final product of the Medicare and Chronic Care in the 21st Century study panel, a panel convened by the National Academy of Social Insurance as part of its Making Medicare Restructuring Work project. The panel was charged with determining the health care and related needs of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic conditions, how well Medicare meets their needs, features of the current Medicare program that support or impede good chronic care, and the experience of other chronic care models. The study panel focused on original Medicare, Medicare's traditional fee-for-service program. It chose this focus because 35 million of Medicare's 40 million beneficiaries are covered under this system. The study panel also recommended changes to the Medicare+Choice (M+C) system, as changes to M+C may be easier to facilitate.","PeriodicalId":73765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health care law & policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health care law & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.555632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

This report is about how Medicare could improve care for beneficiaries with chronic conditions. During the mid-1960s, acute care - not chronic care - was the major focus of medicine. When Medicare was instituted in 1965, it was modeled after the health insurance system of that time. Medicare was to function primarily as a claims payer; its benefit package and reimbursement systems were not designed for chronic conditions; preventive services were excluded; and reimbursement was paid only for in-person visits and procedures to individual providers. Since then, good chronic care and comprehensive coverage have become crucial to Medicare beneficiaries. Though some improvements have been made to Medicare, major changes in the provision and financing of chronic care for Medicare beneficiaries are needed. Medicare has the potential to refocus its Medicare program - as well as the nation's health care system - and should take a leading role in improving chronic care. This report is the final product of the Medicare and Chronic Care in the 21st Century study panel, a panel convened by the National Academy of Social Insurance as part of its Making Medicare Restructuring Work project. The panel was charged with determining the health care and related needs of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic conditions, how well Medicare meets their needs, features of the current Medicare program that support or impede good chronic care, and the experience of other chronic care models. The study panel focused on original Medicare, Medicare's traditional fee-for-service program. It chose this focus because 35 million of Medicare's 40 million beneficiaries are covered under this system. The study panel also recommended changes to the Medicare+Choice (M+C) system, as changes to M+C may be easier to facilitate.
21世纪的医疗保险:建立一个更好的慢性病护理体系
这份报告是关于医疗保险如何改善慢性病受益人的护理。在20世纪60年代中期,急性护理——而非慢性护理——是医学的主要焦点。当医疗保险制度在1965年建立时,它是以当时的医疗保险制度为蓝本的。医疗保险主要是作为索赔支付者;它的福利方案和报销制度不是为慢性病设计的;预防服务不包括在内;而且,报销只针对个人医生的亲自就诊和治疗。从那时起,良好的慢性护理和全面的覆盖范围对医疗保险受益人至关重要。尽管医疗保险制度已经有了一些改进,但在为医疗保险受益人提供慢性病护理和融资方面仍需进行重大改革。医疗保险有可能重新调整其医疗保险计划以及国家医疗保健系统的重点,并应在改善慢性病护理方面发挥主导作用。本报告是21世纪医疗保险和慢性护理研究小组的最终成果,该小组由国家社会保险学会召集,作为其医疗保险重组工作项目的一部分。该小组负责确定慢性疾病医疗保险受益人的医疗保健和相关需求,医疗保险如何满足他们的需求,当前医疗保险计划支持或阻碍良好慢性护理的特点,以及其他慢性护理模式的经验。研究小组关注的是最初的联邦医疗保险,即联邦医疗保险传统的按服务收费项目。它之所以选择这个重点,是因为医疗保险的4000万受益人中有3500万人在这个体系之下。研究小组还建议对医疗保险+选择(M+C)制度进行改革,因为M+C制度的改革可能更容易促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信