Privacy and the Modern Grid

S. K. McNeil
{"title":"Privacy and the Modern Grid","authors":"S. K. McNeil","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1928254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern electrical grid is evolving from an outdated network to a \"smart grid\" system equipped with sophisticated \"smart meters.\" This transition brings with it new threats to privacy. The smart grid's essential innovation is information, and the data that is collected and stored by smart meters can be analyzed to reveal medical conditions, criminal activity, and other information on life within the home. This data is not clearly covered by existing, sector-specific federal privacy statutes. Fully realizing the benefits of the smart grid, however, requires bringing advanced meters into as many homes and businesses as possible. As a result, it is unlikely that consumers will be permitted to opt out of smart meter installation. To secure individual privacy and consumer trust during the deployment of this technology, an individual's smart meter data should be protected from suspicionless access by law enforcement. This paper discusses two potential sources of privacy protections: the courts, through the Fourth Amendment, and Congress, through new federal privacy legislation. It explains why the third party doctrine should not be interpreted to defeat Fourth Amendment protections for an individual's smart meter data. Securing consumer trust, however, may require greater assurance than prognosticating a future Court's ruling can provide. Therefore, this paper also proposes two models for federal legislation to protect individual privacy.","PeriodicalId":81374,"journal":{"name":"Harvard journal of law & technology","volume":"100 1","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard journal of law & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1928254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The modern electrical grid is evolving from an outdated network to a "smart grid" system equipped with sophisticated "smart meters." This transition brings with it new threats to privacy. The smart grid's essential innovation is information, and the data that is collected and stored by smart meters can be analyzed to reveal medical conditions, criminal activity, and other information on life within the home. This data is not clearly covered by existing, sector-specific federal privacy statutes. Fully realizing the benefits of the smart grid, however, requires bringing advanced meters into as many homes and businesses as possible. As a result, it is unlikely that consumers will be permitted to opt out of smart meter installation. To secure individual privacy and consumer trust during the deployment of this technology, an individual's smart meter data should be protected from suspicionless access by law enforcement. This paper discusses two potential sources of privacy protections: the courts, through the Fourth Amendment, and Congress, through new federal privacy legislation. It explains why the third party doctrine should not be interpreted to defeat Fourth Amendment protections for an individual's smart meter data. Securing consumer trust, however, may require greater assurance than prognosticating a future Court's ruling can provide. Therefore, this paper also proposes two models for federal legislation to protect individual privacy.
隐私和现代网格
现代电网正在从一个过时的网络演变为一个配备了复杂的“智能电表”的“智能电网”系统。这种转变给隐私带来了新的威胁。智能电网的本质创新在于信息,通过分析智能电表收集和存储的数据,可以揭示医疗状况、犯罪活动和家庭生活的其他信息。现有的针对特定行业的联邦隐私法规并未明确涵盖这些数据。然而,要充分实现智能电网的好处,需要将先进的电表引入尽可能多的家庭和企业。因此,消费者不太可能被允许选择不安装智能电表。为了在部署这项技术期间确保个人隐私和消费者信任,个人的智能电表数据应该受到执法部门的保护,以免受到怀疑。本文讨论了隐私保护的两个潜在来源:通过第四修正案的法院和通过新的联邦隐私立法的国会。它解释了为什么第三方原则不应该被解释为推翻第四修正案对个人智能电表数据的保护。然而,获得消费者信任可能需要比预测未来法院裁决所能提供的更大的保证。因此,本文还提出了联邦立法保护个人隐私的两种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信