Contrasting adaptations to drought stress in field-grown Ziziphus mauritiana and Prunus persica trees: water relations, osmotic adjustment and carbon isotope composition

S. Arndt, W. Wanek, S. Clifford, M. Popp
{"title":"Contrasting adaptations to drought stress in field-grown Ziziphus mauritiana and Prunus persica trees: water relations, osmotic adjustment and carbon isotope composition","authors":"S. Arndt, W. Wanek, S. Clifford, M. Popp","doi":"10.1071/PP00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drought resistance strategies of Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk. and peach (Prunus persica L.) were studied, focusing on changes in leaf water potential, carbon isotope composition, and solute and stress metabolite contents during an annual cycle under natural rainfed conditions at a field site in Zimbabwe. After a 100-d drought period, leaf water potential (yleaf) of peach trees decreased to –2.0 MPa, whereas yleaf of Z. mauritiana remained constant at –0.7 MPa. Values for the natural abundance of 13 C (d13 C) of bulk peach leaves as well as of total water-soluble compounds and soluble sugars of leaves increased gradually, resulting in significantly higher values as drought stress developed, indicative of increased water use efficiency (WUE). By the end of the dry season, both leaves and roots of peach exhibited osmotic adjustment, with significant accumulation of monosaccharide sugars, anions and cations in the leaves. Sorbitol and oxalate accounted for the greatest proportion of solute increases during drought, while foliar sucrose content decreased. In roots, soluble sugars such as sorbitol, glucose and fructose all increased, whereas root starch content decreased. For Z. mauritiana leaves, neither d13 C values nor soluble sugar concentrations changed markedly during the study period, and Z. mauritiana plants showed no osmotic adjustment during the dry season. Data indicate that the two species exhibited different strategies for coping with soil moisture deficits under field conditions. Although Z. mauritiana exhibited the capacity for osmotic adjustment in glasshouse experiments, the trees avoided drought stress in this investigation, which is an indication of a root system that has access to deeper moist soil layers. In contrast, the increased WUE in peach is likely due to stomatal control of water loss with onset of drought stress. The observed active osmotic adjustment to maintain turgor is in contrast to glasshouse studies, where no osmotic adjustment was found, and emphasizes the importance of field studies where stress develops more slowly.","PeriodicalId":8650,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PP00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

Drought resistance strategies of Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk. and peach (Prunus persica L.) were studied, focusing on changes in leaf water potential, carbon isotope composition, and solute and stress metabolite contents during an annual cycle under natural rainfed conditions at a field site in Zimbabwe. After a 100-d drought period, leaf water potential (yleaf) of peach trees decreased to –2.0 MPa, whereas yleaf of Z. mauritiana remained constant at –0.7 MPa. Values for the natural abundance of 13 C (d13 C) of bulk peach leaves as well as of total water-soluble compounds and soluble sugars of leaves increased gradually, resulting in significantly higher values as drought stress developed, indicative of increased water use efficiency (WUE). By the end of the dry season, both leaves and roots of peach exhibited osmotic adjustment, with significant accumulation of monosaccharide sugars, anions and cations in the leaves. Sorbitol and oxalate accounted for the greatest proportion of solute increases during drought, while foliar sucrose content decreased. In roots, soluble sugars such as sorbitol, glucose and fructose all increased, whereas root starch content decreased. For Z. mauritiana leaves, neither d13 C values nor soluble sugar concentrations changed markedly during the study period, and Z. mauritiana plants showed no osmotic adjustment during the dry season. Data indicate that the two species exhibited different strategies for coping with soil moisture deficits under field conditions. Although Z. mauritiana exhibited the capacity for osmotic adjustment in glasshouse experiments, the trees avoided drought stress in this investigation, which is an indication of a root system that has access to deeper moist soil layers. In contrast, the increased WUE in peach is likely due to stomatal control of water loss with onset of drought stress. The observed active osmotic adjustment to maintain turgor is in contrast to glasshouse studies, where no osmotic adjustment was found, and emphasizes the importance of field studies where stress develops more slowly.
田间生长的毛里求斯紫皮树和桃李树对干旱胁迫的适应对比:水分关系、渗透调节和碳同位素组成
毛利亚纳木的抗旱策略。以津巴布韦某野外试验点为研究对象,研究了自然旱作条件下桃树叶片水势、碳同位素组成、溶质和胁迫代谢物含量在年循环中的变化。干旱100 d后,桃树叶片水势(yleaf)下降至-2.0 MPa,而毛里求斯树叶片水势保持在-0.7 MPa不变。随着干旱胁迫的加剧,桃叶片13c自然丰度、总水溶性化合物和可溶性糖自然丰度逐渐升高,水分利用效率(WUE)显著提高。旱季结束后,桃叶片和根系均出现渗透调节,单糖、阴离子和阳离子在叶片中积累显著。干旱期间,山梨醇和草酸盐占溶质增加的最大比例,而叶片蔗糖含量下降。在根中,山梨醇、葡萄糖和果糖等可溶性糖含量均增加,而根淀粉含量降低。毛竹叶片的d13c值和可溶性糖浓度在研究期间都没有显著变化,毛竹植株在旱季没有表现出渗透调节。数据表明,在田间条件下,这两个物种表现出不同的应对土壤水分亏缺的策略。虽然毛里求斯树在温室试验中表现出渗透调节能力,但在本研究中,树木避免了干旱胁迫,这表明根系可以进入更深的潮湿土层。相反,水分利用效率的增加可能是由于干旱胁迫开始时气孔对水分流失的控制。观察到的主动渗透调节维持膨胀与没有发现渗透调节的温室研究相反,并强调了应力发展较慢的实地研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信