TO SPECIFY THE CONCEPT OF WORTHY WORK

М. Panchenko
{"title":"TO SPECIFY THE CONCEPT OF WORTHY WORK","authors":"М. Panchenko","doi":"10.37440/soclaw.2019.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the current scientific approaches of Ukrainian and foreign scientists, within which the concept of decent work is interpreted. The author pays special attention to the critical analysis of the ILO's interpretation of the concept of decent work, to clarify the admissibility of different interpretations of the concept of decent work in practical reality, as well as to outline the main risks of lack of a universal and comprehensive understanding of the corresponding concept. \nThe approach to understanding the concept of decent work, developed within the framework of the ILO, has been analyzed and it is concluded that it is obviously imperfect, since it is formulated by listing the criteria of this work, which, in fact, do not exhaust the essential content of the corresponding concept. \nThe scientist draws attention to the problem of determining the criteria of decent work, which are set out in the definition of the relevant socio-legal phenomenon, since they are formulated in too general a form. For example, the criterion for the concept of decent work, which is the requirement for the adequacy of the employment income of the employee, or the criterion of the ability of labor to provide social protection of the employee. \nScientists emphasize that the significance (intrinsic or conceptual value) of decent work is ambiguous, because it depends on who formulates this definition, transferring to it all those expectations of the relevant phenomenon, which are characteristic of the group of persons to whom the person belonging to recognizes the importance of decent work. The difference in approaches to this definition is emphasized from the position of the employer and from the position of the employee. \nImportant achievement of the article is the formulation of the author's definition of the concept of \"decent work”.","PeriodicalId":82482,"journal":{"name":"Review of socialist law","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of socialist law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37440/soclaw.2019.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes the current scientific approaches of Ukrainian and foreign scientists, within which the concept of decent work is interpreted. The author pays special attention to the critical analysis of the ILO's interpretation of the concept of decent work, to clarify the admissibility of different interpretations of the concept of decent work in practical reality, as well as to outline the main risks of lack of a universal and comprehensive understanding of the corresponding concept. The approach to understanding the concept of decent work, developed within the framework of the ILO, has been analyzed and it is concluded that it is obviously imperfect, since it is formulated by listing the criteria of this work, which, in fact, do not exhaust the essential content of the corresponding concept. The scientist draws attention to the problem of determining the criteria of decent work, which are set out in the definition of the relevant socio-legal phenomenon, since they are formulated in too general a form. For example, the criterion for the concept of decent work, which is the requirement for the adequacy of the employment income of the employee, or the criterion of the ability of labor to provide social protection of the employee. Scientists emphasize that the significance (intrinsic or conceptual value) of decent work is ambiguous, because it depends on who formulates this definition, transferring to it all those expectations of the relevant phenomenon, which are characteristic of the group of persons to whom the person belonging to recognizes the importance of decent work. The difference in approaches to this definition is emphasized from the position of the employer and from the position of the employee. Important achievement of the article is the formulation of the author's definition of the concept of "decent work”.
明确有价值工作的概念
文章描述了乌克兰和外国科学家目前的科学方法,其中解释了体面工作的概念。作者特别注意对国际劳工组织对体面工作概念的解释进行批判性分析,以澄清在实际现实中对体面工作概念的不同解释的可接受性,并概述缺乏对相应概念的普遍和全面理解的主要风险。对劳工组织框架内制定的理解体面工作概念的方法进行了分析,得出的结论是,它显然是不完善的,因为它是通过列出这项工作的标准来拟订的,而这些标准实际上并没有穷尽相应概念的基本内容。这位科学家提请注意确定体面工作标准的问题,这些标准是在有关社会法律现象的定义中提出的,因为这些标准的形式过于笼统。例如,体面劳动概念的标准,这是对雇员的就业收入是否充足的要求,或者是劳动为雇员提供社会保护的能力的标准。科学家强调,体面工作的意义(内在或概念价值)是模糊的,因为它取决于谁制定这一定义,将所有相关现象的期望转移到它身上,这些期望是认识到体面工作重要性的人所属的群体的特征。从雇主的立场和雇员的立场强调了对这一定义的不同看法。本文的重要成果是作者对“体面劳动”概念的界定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书