A clinical study of prevalence, risk factors and management of dry eye at regional eye hospital

D. Archana
{"title":"A clinical study of prevalence, risk factors and management of dry eye at regional eye hospital","authors":"D. Archana","doi":"10.33545/26638266.2021.v3.i2a.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Dry eye is a common multifactorial disorder of tear film resulting in ocular discomfort and tear-film instability with potential damage to ocular surface, due to decreased tear production or increased tear evaporation. It progressively increases in severity and if not detected may lead to sight threatening complications. This study was undertaken to study the prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic tests for dry eye. Methods: This study was conducted in Ophthalmology OPD at Regional Eye Hospital and attached to kakatiya Medical College, Warangal from September 2017 to August 2019. 300 patients were enrolled in this study. Occupation, smoking history and other systemic co-morbidities were documented. They were given OSDI questionnaire and subjected to four tests (Schirmer’s test, TBUT, Rose Bengal test, Fluorescein staining). If ≥2 tests were positive, the patients were diagnosed as dry eye. All dry eye patients were treated with tear substitutes and those with MGD were treated with tablet Doxycycline 100mg BD. Results and Conclusion: Dry eye prevalence was found to be 46.7%. It was more prevalent in females >40 years of age (60.4%). The prevalence increased with increasing age more among patients >50 years of age (49.3%) followed by age group 30-39 years (35%). Patients with outdoor jobs such as farmers, labourers had higher percentage of dry eye (50%) followed by office workers (22.1%). 70% of the dry eye patients had refractive error with or without history of spectacle use (p<0.00). It was more among the smokers than non-smokers. Patients having diabetes mellitus had higher prevalence of dry eye (29.3%) (p<0.00). TBUT showed high sensitivity and specificity while Schirmer’s test was highly specific, followed by other tests. Based on OSDI scores, most patients had moderate dry eye symptoms. During follow-up there was improvement in OSDI scores while no significant improvement in diagnostic test scores.","PeriodicalId":14021,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2021.v3.i2a.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Dry eye is a common multifactorial disorder of tear film resulting in ocular discomfort and tear-film instability with potential damage to ocular surface, due to decreased tear production or increased tear evaporation. It progressively increases in severity and if not detected may lead to sight threatening complications. This study was undertaken to study the prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic tests for dry eye. Methods: This study was conducted in Ophthalmology OPD at Regional Eye Hospital and attached to kakatiya Medical College, Warangal from September 2017 to August 2019. 300 patients were enrolled in this study. Occupation, smoking history and other systemic co-morbidities were documented. They were given OSDI questionnaire and subjected to four tests (Schirmer’s test, TBUT, Rose Bengal test, Fluorescein staining). If ≥2 tests were positive, the patients were diagnosed as dry eye. All dry eye patients were treated with tear substitutes and those with MGD were treated with tablet Doxycycline 100mg BD. Results and Conclusion: Dry eye prevalence was found to be 46.7%. It was more prevalent in females >40 years of age (60.4%). The prevalence increased with increasing age more among patients >50 years of age (49.3%) followed by age group 30-39 years (35%). Patients with outdoor jobs such as farmers, labourers had higher percentage of dry eye (50%) followed by office workers (22.1%). 70% of the dry eye patients had refractive error with or without history of spectacle use (p<0.00). It was more among the smokers than non-smokers. Patients having diabetes mellitus had higher prevalence of dry eye (29.3%) (p<0.00). TBUT showed high sensitivity and specificity while Schirmer’s test was highly specific, followed by other tests. Based on OSDI scores, most patients had moderate dry eye symptoms. During follow-up there was improvement in OSDI scores while no significant improvement in diagnostic test scores.
地区眼科医院干眼症患病率、危险因素及治疗的临床研究
背景和目的:干眼症是一种常见的泪膜多因素疾病,由于泪液分泌减少或泪液蒸发增加,导致眼部不适和泪膜不稳定,并可能对眼表造成损害。它的严重程度逐渐增加,如果不及时发现,可能导致威胁视力的并发症。本研究旨在探讨干眼症的患病率、危险因素及诊断方法。方法:本研究于2017年9月至2019年8月在瓦朗加尔市kakatiya医学院附属地区眼科医院眼科OPD进行。300名患者参加了这项研究。记录职业、吸烟史和其他系统性合并症。给予OSDI问卷,并进行四项检查(Schirmer试验、TBUT、Rose Bengal试验、荧光素染色)。≥2项阳性诊断为干眼症。所有干眼症患者均采用泪液代用品治疗,MGD患者均采用多西环素片100mg BD治疗。结果与结论:干眼症患病率为46.7%。以>40岁的女性多见(60.4%)。随着年龄的增长,患病率以>50岁的患者居多(49.3%),其次是30-39岁的患者(35%)。从事户外工作的患者,如农民、体力劳动者,干眼症的比例较高(50%),其次是办公室工作人员(22.1%)。干眼症患者有或无配戴眼镜史的屈光不正占70% (p<0.00)。吸烟的人比不吸烟的人更多。糖尿病患者干眼发生率较高(29.3%)(p<0.00)。TBUT具有较高的敏感性和特异性,而Schirmer试验具有较高的特异性,其他试验紧随其后。根据OSDI评分,大多数患者有中度干眼症状。在随访期间,OSDI得分有改善,而诊断测试得分无显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信