Extraction and determination of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate from apoplastic fluid of stem of rooted and non-rooted cuttings in relation to the rhizogenesis

K. C. Zuffellato-Ribas, S. Morini, P. Picciarelli, F. Mignolli
{"title":"Extraction and determination of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate from apoplastic fluid of stem of rooted and non-rooted cuttings in relation to the rhizogenesis","authors":"K. C. Zuffellato-Ribas, S. Morini, P. Picciarelli, F. Mignolli","doi":"10.1590/S1677-04202010000200006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from semihardwood branches of peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5, plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera × P. salicina) × (P. cerasifera × P. persica) cv. Ishtara and olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio, cuttings were collected and treated with 0 mg.L-1 and 2500 mg.L-1 of indolebutyric acid (IBA) by immersion in the base of the cuttings. After 60 days of planting, the cultivars MRS 2/5, Ishtara and Frantoio presented a significative difference with relation to the rooting induction by application of the indolebutyric acid (27.5, 47.5 and 41.25 %, respectively), inducing a higher number of roots per cutting without at the same time significantly increasing the length of the roots themselves. The levels of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate in the rooted and non-rooted cuttings of the three cultivars were determined. These parameters varied in function of the consistency of the cuttings from each species, but showed a positive correlation between the increase of the rooting and the increase of the ascorbate in the reduced form.","PeriodicalId":9278,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202010000200006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Starting from semihardwood branches of peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5, plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera × P. salicina) × (P. cerasifera × P. persica) cv. Ishtara and olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio, cuttings were collected and treated with 0 mg.L-1 and 2500 mg.L-1 of indolebutyric acid (IBA) by immersion in the base of the cuttings. After 60 days of planting, the cultivars MRS 2/5, Ishtara and Frantoio presented a significative difference with relation to the rooting induction by application of the indolebutyric acid (27.5, 47.5 and 41.25 %, respectively), inducing a higher number of roots per cutting without at the same time significantly increasing the length of the roots themselves. The levels of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate in the rooted and non-rooted cuttings of the three cultivars were determined. These parameters varied in function of the consistency of the cuttings from each species, but showed a positive correlation between the increase of the rooting and the increase of the ascorbate in the reduced form.
从有根和无根插枝茎外胞液中提取和测定抗坏血酸和脱氢抗坏血酸与根发生的关系
从桃和李砧木(Prunus cerasifera E.)的半硬木枝开始。MRS2/5,李子砧木(Prunus cerasifera × P. salicina) × (P. cerasifera × P. persica) cv。伊丝塔拉和橄榄树(Olea europaea L.)收集插枝,用0 mg处理。L-1和2500毫克。L-1的吲哚丁酸(IBA)浸泡在岩屑底部。种植60 d后,品种MRS 2/5、Ishtara和Frantoio在吲哚丁酸诱导生根方面存在显著差异(分别为27.5%、47.5%和41.25%),每根诱导根数较高,但根系本身长度未显著增加。测定了3个品种有根和无根扦插中抗坏血酸和脱氢抗坏血酸的含量。这些参数随各种属扦插一致性的变化而变化,但在还原型中,生根的增加与抗坏血酸的增加呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信