Teaching in the Face of Academic Diversity: Unit Planning and Instruction by Secondary Teachers to Enhance Learning in Inclusive Classes

Daniel J. Boudah, B. Lenz, J. Schumaker, D. Deshler
{"title":"Teaching in the Face of Academic Diversity: Unit Planning and Instruction by Secondary Teachers to Enhance Learning in Inclusive Classes","authors":"Daniel J. Boudah, B. Lenz, J. Schumaker, D. Deshler","doi":"10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V2I2P74-91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teacher planning is a highly personal process, one that may be relatively complex when teachers attempt to differentiate instruction. Planning and individualizing instruction also may be problematic, particularly in secondary school settings, because of the curricular demands and the systemic variables that distinguish secondary from elementary schools (Cuban, 1993; Schumaker & Deshler, 1988). The purpose of this study was to explore how secondary teachers make decisions about differentiation in units of content instruction. Questions were developed and posed to the teachers during telephone interviews to document changes in teacher planning processes in conjunction with development and use of the Unit Organizer Routine. Detailed qualitative analysis of teacher responses revealed that they began thinking more carefully about their emphasis on certain aspects of the content, the organization of content as presented by texts, and the difficulty of learning certain aspects of the content. Despite these changes in planning and unit development, teachers’ classroom assessment methods remained unchanged.","PeriodicalId":31424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","volume":"96 1","pages":"74-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V2I2P74-91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Teacher planning is a highly personal process, one that may be relatively complex when teachers attempt to differentiate instruction. Planning and individualizing instruction also may be problematic, particularly in secondary school settings, because of the curricular demands and the systemic variables that distinguish secondary from elementary schools (Cuban, 1993; Schumaker & Deshler, 1988). The purpose of this study was to explore how secondary teachers make decisions about differentiation in units of content instruction. Questions were developed and posed to the teachers during telephone interviews to document changes in teacher planning processes in conjunction with development and use of the Unit Organizer Routine. Detailed qualitative analysis of teacher responses revealed that they began thinking more carefully about their emphasis on certain aspects of the content, the organization of content as presented by texts, and the difficulty of learning certain aspects of the content. Despite these changes in planning and unit development, teachers’ classroom assessment methods remained unchanged.
面对学术多样性的教学:单元规划与中学教师的指导以促进全纳课堂的学习
教师计划是一个高度个人化的过程,当教师试图区分教学时,这个过程可能相对复杂。规划和个性化教学也可能有问题,特别是在中学环境中,因为课程要求和区分中学和小学的系统变量(Cuban, 1993;Schumaker & Deshler, 1988)。本研究的目的是探讨中学教师如何在内容教学单元中做出差异化决策。在电话采访中,我们向教师提出了一些问题,以记录教师规划过程中与单元组织者常规的开发和使用相结合的变化。对教师反应的详细定性分析表明,他们开始更加仔细地思考他们对内容的某些方面的重视程度、文本呈现的内容组织以及学习内容某些方面的难度。尽管在规划和单元发展方面发生了这些变化,但教师的课堂评估方法没有改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信