Discovering Patterns for Fact Checking in Knowledge Graphs

Peng Lin, Qi Song, Yinghui Wu, Jiaxing Pi
{"title":"Discovering Patterns for Fact Checking in Knowledge Graphs","authors":"Peng Lin, Qi Song, Yinghui Wu, Jiaxing Pi","doi":"10.1145/3286488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a new framework that incorporates graph patterns to support fact checking in knowledge graphs. Our method discovers discriminant graph patterns to construct classifiers for fact prediction. First, we propose a class of graph fact checking rules (GFCs). A GFC incorporates graph patterns that best distinguish true and false facts of generalized fact statements. We provide statistical measures to characterize useful patterns that are both discriminant and diversified. Second, we show that it is feasible to discover GFCs in large graphs with optimality guarantees. We develop an algorithm that performs localized search to generate a stream of graph patterns, and dynamically assemble the best GFCs from multiple GFC sets, where each set ensures quality scores within certain ranges. The algorithm guarantees a (1/2−ϵ) approximation when it (early) terminates. We also develop a space-efficient alternative that dynamically spawns prioritized patterns with best marginal gains to the verified GFCs. It guarantees a (1−1/e) approximation. Both strategies guarantee a bounded time cost independent of the size of the underlying graph. Third, to support fact checking, we develop two classifiers, which make use of top-ranked GFCs as predictive rules or instance-level features of the pattern matches induced by GFCs, respectively. Using real-world data, we experimentally verify the efficiency and the effectiveness of GFC-based techniques for fact checking in knowledge graphs and verify its application in knowledge exploration and news prediction.","PeriodicalId":15582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","volume":"104 1","pages":"1 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3286488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article presents a new framework that incorporates graph patterns to support fact checking in knowledge graphs. Our method discovers discriminant graph patterns to construct classifiers for fact prediction. First, we propose a class of graph fact checking rules (GFCs). A GFC incorporates graph patterns that best distinguish true and false facts of generalized fact statements. We provide statistical measures to characterize useful patterns that are both discriminant and diversified. Second, we show that it is feasible to discover GFCs in large graphs with optimality guarantees. We develop an algorithm that performs localized search to generate a stream of graph patterns, and dynamically assemble the best GFCs from multiple GFC sets, where each set ensures quality scores within certain ranges. The algorithm guarantees a (1/2−ϵ) approximation when it (early) terminates. We also develop a space-efficient alternative that dynamically spawns prioritized patterns with best marginal gains to the verified GFCs. It guarantees a (1−1/e) approximation. Both strategies guarantee a bounded time cost independent of the size of the underlying graph. Third, to support fact checking, we develop two classifiers, which make use of top-ranked GFCs as predictive rules or instance-level features of the pattern matches induced by GFCs, respectively. Using real-world data, we experimentally verify the efficiency and the effectiveness of GFC-based techniques for fact checking in knowledge graphs and verify its application in knowledge exploration and news prediction.
发现知识图中事实检查的模式
本文提出了一个新的框架,它结合了图形模式来支持知识图中的事实检查。我们的方法发现判别图模式来构建分类器进行事实预测。首先,我们提出了一类图事实检查规则(gfc)。GFC包含图形模式,可以最好地区分广义事实陈述的真假事实。我们提供统计措施,以表征有用的模式,既歧视和多样化。其次,我们证明了在具有最优性保证的大型图中发现gfc是可行的。我们开发了一种算法,该算法执行本地化搜索以生成图形模式流,并动态地从多个GFC集中组装最佳GFC,其中每个GFC集确保在一定范围内的质量分数。该算法在(早期)终止时保证(1/2−λ)近似。我们还开发了一种节省空间的替代方案,可以动态生成具有最佳边际收益的优先模式,以验证gfc。它保证了(1 - 1/e)近似。这两种策略都保证了与底层图的大小无关的有限时间成本。第三,为了支持事实检查,我们开发了两个分类器,它们分别使用排名最高的GFCs作为预测规则或GFCs诱导的模式匹配的实例级特征。利用实际数据,实验验证了基于gfc的知识图事实检查技术的效率和有效性,并验证了其在知识探索和新闻预测中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信