Van Dordtse Leerregels naar kanttekeningen bij de Statenvertaling. Een methodologische bijdrage

Q4 Arts and Humanities
J. Schneider, W.H.Th. Moehn
{"title":"Van Dordtse Leerregels naar kanttekeningen bij de Statenvertaling. Een methodologische bijdrage","authors":"J. Schneider, W.H.Th. Moehn","doi":"10.21827/tr.66.2.159-175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to answer the question of how the biblical references in the Canons of Dordt influenced the annotations in the margin of the ‘Statenvertaling’ (Authorized Version). Using the Microsoft Excel digital spreadsheet to analyse the results of existing research, the article illustrates how biblical references in the Canons of Dordt and the Heidelberg Catechism can be adequately compared, and then compares the marginal notes of the Deux-Aes Bible with the annotations of the Authorized Version. The conclusions shows that more than 25% of the relevant vocabulary in the annotations is found in the Canons of Dordt, but not in the quoted texts of the Authorized Version.","PeriodicalId":36470,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.66.2.159-175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to answer the question of how the biblical references in the Canons of Dordt influenced the annotations in the margin of the ‘Statenvertaling’ (Authorized Version). Using the Microsoft Excel digital spreadsheet to analyse the results of existing research, the article illustrates how biblical references in the Canons of Dordt and the Heidelberg Catechism can be adequately compared, and then compares the marginal notes of the Deux-Aes Bible with the annotations of the Authorized Version. The conclusions shows that more than 25% of the relevant vocabulary in the annotations is found in the Canons of Dordt, but not in the quoted texts of the Authorized Version.
从多德莱希特的教义到荷兰语翻译的注释。方法贡献
本研究试图回答多特正典中的圣经参考如何影响“Statenvertaling”(授权版本)边缘的注释的问题。本文利用Microsoft Excel数字电子表格分析现有的研究结果,说明了《多特正典》和《海德堡要理问答》中的圣经参考文献如何进行充分的比较,然后比较了《双aes圣经》的边缘注释和授权版本的注释。结论表明,注释中有25%以上的相关词汇出现在《多特正典》中,而未出现在《授权本》的引文文本中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信