Signatures of Electrical Stimulation Driven Network Interactions in the Human Limbic System

Gabriela Ojeda Valencia, N. Gregg, Harvey Huang, B. Lundstrom, B. Brinkmann, T. Pal Attia, J. V. Van Gompel, M. Bernstein, M. In, J. Huston, G. Worrell, K. Miller, D. Hermes
{"title":"Signatures of Electrical Stimulation Driven Network Interactions in the Human Limbic System","authors":"Gabriela Ojeda Valencia, N. Gregg, Harvey Huang, B. Lundstrom, B. Brinkmann, T. Pal Attia, J. V. Van Gompel, M. Bernstein, M. In, J. Huston, G. Worrell, K. Miller, D. Hermes","doi":"10.1101/2022.11.23.517746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stimulation-evoked signals are starting to be used as biomarkers to indicate the state and health of brain networks. The human limbic network, often targeted for brain stimulation therapy, is involved in emotion and memory processing. Previous anatomic, neurophysiological, and functional studies suggest distinct subsystems within the limbic network (Rolls, 2015). Studies using intracranial electrical stimulation, however, have emphasized the similarities of the evoked waveforms across the limbic network. We test whether these subsystems have distinct stimulation-driven signatures. In eight patients (four male, four female) with drug-resistant epilepsy, we stimulated the limbic system with single-pulse electrical stimulation. Reliable corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were measured between hippocampus and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and between the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). However, the CCEP waveform in the PCC after hippocampal stimulation showed a unique and reliable morphology, which we term the “limbic Hippocampus-Anterior nucleus of the thalamus-Posterior cingulate, HAP-wave.” This limbic HAP-wave was visually distinct and separately decoded from the CCEP waveform in ACC after amygdala stimulation. Diffusion MRI data show that the measured end points in the PCC overlap with the end points of the parolfactory cingulum bundle rather than the parahippocampal cingulum, suggesting that the limbic HAP-wave may travel through fornix, mammillary bodies, and the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT). This was further confirmed by stimulating the ANT, which evoked the same limbic HAP-wave but with an earlier latency. Limbic subsystems have unique stimulation-evoked signatures that may be used in the future to help network pathology diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The limbic system is often compromised in diverse clinical conditions, such as epilepsy or Alzheimer’s disease, and characterizing its typical circuit responses may provide diagnostic insight. Stimulation-evoked waveforms have been used in the motor system to diagnose circuit pathology. We translate this framework to limbic subsystems using human intracranial stereo EEG (sEEG) recordings that measure deeper brain areas. Our sEEG recordings describe a stimulation-evoked waveform characteristic to the memory and spatial subsystem of the limbic network that we term the “limbic HAP-wave.” The limbic HAP-wave follows anatomic white matter pathways from hippocampus to thalamus to the posterior cingulum and shows promise as a distinct biomarker of signaling in the human brain memory and spatial limbic network.","PeriodicalId":22786,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"9 6 1","pages":"6697 - 6711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.23.517746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Stimulation-evoked signals are starting to be used as biomarkers to indicate the state and health of brain networks. The human limbic network, often targeted for brain stimulation therapy, is involved in emotion and memory processing. Previous anatomic, neurophysiological, and functional studies suggest distinct subsystems within the limbic network (Rolls, 2015). Studies using intracranial electrical stimulation, however, have emphasized the similarities of the evoked waveforms across the limbic network. We test whether these subsystems have distinct stimulation-driven signatures. In eight patients (four male, four female) with drug-resistant epilepsy, we stimulated the limbic system with single-pulse electrical stimulation. Reliable corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were measured between hippocampus and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and between the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). However, the CCEP waveform in the PCC after hippocampal stimulation showed a unique and reliable morphology, which we term the “limbic Hippocampus-Anterior nucleus of the thalamus-Posterior cingulate, HAP-wave.” This limbic HAP-wave was visually distinct and separately decoded from the CCEP waveform in ACC after amygdala stimulation. Diffusion MRI data show that the measured end points in the PCC overlap with the end points of the parolfactory cingulum bundle rather than the parahippocampal cingulum, suggesting that the limbic HAP-wave may travel through fornix, mammillary bodies, and the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT). This was further confirmed by stimulating the ANT, which evoked the same limbic HAP-wave but with an earlier latency. Limbic subsystems have unique stimulation-evoked signatures that may be used in the future to help network pathology diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The limbic system is often compromised in diverse clinical conditions, such as epilepsy or Alzheimer’s disease, and characterizing its typical circuit responses may provide diagnostic insight. Stimulation-evoked waveforms have been used in the motor system to diagnose circuit pathology. We translate this framework to limbic subsystems using human intracranial stereo EEG (sEEG) recordings that measure deeper brain areas. Our sEEG recordings describe a stimulation-evoked waveform characteristic to the memory and spatial subsystem of the limbic network that we term the “limbic HAP-wave.” The limbic HAP-wave follows anatomic white matter pathways from hippocampus to thalamus to the posterior cingulum and shows promise as a distinct biomarker of signaling in the human brain memory and spatial limbic network.
电刺激驱动的人类边缘系统网络相互作用的特征
刺激诱发的信号开始被用作指示大脑网络状态和健康的生物标志物。人类边缘网络通常是脑刺激疗法的目标,它与情绪和记忆处理有关。先前的解剖学、神经生理学和功能研究表明,边缘网络中存在不同的子系统(Rolls, 2015)。然而,使用颅内电刺激的研究强调了边缘网络中诱发波形的相似性。我们测试这些子系统是否具有不同的刺激驱动特征。在8例(4男4女)耐药癫痫患者中,我们用单脉冲电刺激刺激边缘系统。测定海马与后扣带皮层(PCC)、杏仁核与前扣带皮层(ACC)之间的可靠皮质诱发电位(CCEPs)。然而,海马刺激后PCC的CCEP波形显示出一种独特而可靠的形态,我们称之为“海马体边缘-丘脑前核-后扣带,hap波”。杏仁核刺激后,ACC的边缘hap波在视觉上是不同的,并且与CCEP波形分开解码。弥散性MRI数据显示,PCC的测量终点与嗅侧扣带束的终点重叠,而不是与海马旁扣带的终点重叠,这表明边缘hap波可能穿过穹窿、乳状体和丘脑前核(ANT)。通过刺激ANT进一步证实了这一点,它诱发了相同的边缘hap波,但潜伏期更早。边缘子系统具有独特的刺激诱发特征,可能在未来用于帮助网络病理诊断。意义声明边缘系统在不同的临床条件下经常受损,如癫痫或阿尔茨海默病,表征其典型的电路反应可能提供诊断见解。刺激诱发波形已被用于运动系统的电路病理诊断。我们使用人类颅内立体脑电图(sEEG)记录来测量更深的大脑区域,将这个框架转化为边缘子系统。我们的sEEG记录描述了边缘网络的记忆和空间子系统的刺激诱发波形特征,我们称之为“边缘hap波”。从海马到丘脑再到后扣带,脑边缘hap波跟随解剖白质通路,有望作为人类大脑记忆和空间边缘网络信号的独特生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信