Camps for Children with Cancer and Their Families: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial and Physical Impacts.

L. Kelada, C. Wakefield, Maria C Cruz Silva, C. Signorelli
{"title":"Camps for Children with Cancer and Their Families: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial and Physical Impacts.","authors":"L. Kelada, C. Wakefield, Maria C Cruz Silva, C. Signorelli","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nCamps for children with cancer and their families aim to promote positive psychosocial and physical outcomes for attendees. However, evidence for this is inconsistent, and previous reviews have not delineated between camps for children (patient/survivors and siblings) and family camps (including parents/guardians). Such understanding is necessary to understand the evidence-based benefits of each type of camp. Our systematic review summarizes the findings and limitations of the recent literature for children's camps and family camps.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe searched MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between 2013 and 2018.\n\n\nRESULTS\nUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, we included 19 articles (from 15 studies) in the review. Evidence for the impact of camps was mixed. All articles reported positive outcomes, yet 3 quantitative articles also reported nonsignificant changes. Camps for children (representing 2151 children with cancer/survivors) appeared to facilitate social skills, self-esteem, and physical activity. Family camps (representing 96 families) may provide families the opportunity to reconnect. Both types of camp provide attendees with social support and fun/respite. In 2 qualitative articles, some parents attending family camps reported tension between families of children on treatment and bereaved families. The literature is limited by small sample sizes and the lack of multisite, longitudinal, and controlled study designs.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe recent literature provides evidence for some positive, short-term psychosocial and physical outcomes of camps. Future research should use rigorous quasiexperimental designs and should assess the long-term impact of camp attendance.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Camps for children with cancer and their families aim to promote positive psychosocial and physical outcomes for attendees. However, evidence for this is inconsistent, and previous reviews have not delineated between camps for children (patient/survivors and siblings) and family camps (including parents/guardians). Such understanding is necessary to understand the evidence-based benefits of each type of camp. Our systematic review summarizes the findings and limitations of the recent literature for children's camps and family camps. METHODS We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between 2013 and 2018. RESULTS Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, we included 19 articles (from 15 studies) in the review. Evidence for the impact of camps was mixed. All articles reported positive outcomes, yet 3 quantitative articles also reported nonsignificant changes. Camps for children (representing 2151 children with cancer/survivors) appeared to facilitate social skills, self-esteem, and physical activity. Family camps (representing 96 families) may provide families the opportunity to reconnect. Both types of camp provide attendees with social support and fun/respite. In 2 qualitative articles, some parents attending family camps reported tension between families of children on treatment and bereaved families. The literature is limited by small sample sizes and the lack of multisite, longitudinal, and controlled study designs. CONCLUSION The recent literature provides evidence for some positive, short-term psychosocial and physical outcomes of camps. Future research should use rigorous quasiexperimental designs and should assess the long-term impact of camp attendance.
癌症儿童及其家庭营地:对心理社会和身体影响的系统回顾。
目的:为癌症儿童及其家庭举办的夏令营旨在为参与者促进积极的社会心理和身体结果。然而,这方面的证据是不一致的,以前的综述没有划分儿童营地(病人/幸存者和兄弟姐妹)和家庭营地(包括父母/监护人)。这样的理解对于理解每一种营地的循证益处是必要的。我们的系统综述总结了最近关于儿童营地和家庭营地的文献的发现和局限性。方法检索MEDLINE/PubMed、PsycINFO、Social Work Abstracts和谷歌Scholar,检索2013 - 2018年发表的相关文章。使用系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目,我们纳入了19篇文章(来自15项研究)。有关难民营影响的证据好坏参半。所有的文章都报告了积极的结果,但3篇定量文章也报告了不显著的变化。儿童营地(代表2151名患有癌症的儿童/幸存者)似乎促进了社交技能、自尊和身体活动。家庭营地(代表96个家庭)可能为家庭提供重新联系的机会。两种类型的营地都为参加者提供社会支持和乐趣/喘息。在两篇定性文章中,一些参加家庭营的父母报告说,接受治疗的儿童的家庭与失去亲人的家庭之间关系紧张。文献受限于样本量小,缺乏多地点、纵向和对照研究设计。结论最近的文献为营地的一些积极的、短期的心理和生理结果提供了证据。未来的研究应采用严格的准实验设计,并应评估营地出勤的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信