New Approaches to the Halifax Explosion

Q4 Social Sciences
Regioni Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1353/ACA.2018.0028
Leslie Baker
{"title":"New Approaches to the Halifax Explosion","authors":"Leslie Baker","doi":"10.1353/ACA.2018.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN APRIL 2018, ACTOR ROB LOWE appeared on the American talk show Jimmy Kimmel Live to promote his most recent movie. In the segment he adlibbed about the Halifax Explosion and explained that he had convinced the movie’s producers to change his character’s nickname from “The Explosion” to “The Halifax Explosion.” Lowe went on to (mis)educate the host of the show, Jimmy Kimmel, about the details of the Halifax Explosion, and between the two men it was implied that the explosion was a forgotten historical event. Only four months earlier, on 6 December 2017, following months of preparation and public events leading up to the anniversary, the centenary of the Halifax Explosion was commemorated. The response from Canadians to the segment on Jimmy Kimmel Live was swift and largely condemnatory of both Lowe’s inaccurate recounting of the details of the disaster and the conclusion reached by the men that it was acceptable to laugh about the disaster now because it was 100 years ago and the victims have been “forgotten.”1 In the days that followed the story was picked up by provincial and national news outlets, first as a quirky interest piece but soon the focus shifted to popular outrage that the two men had joked about a tragedy that, despite being a century in the past, is still seen by many as integral to the identity of Haligonians. The short-lived scandal seemed to culminate in a letter being sent from Nova Scotian provincial labour minister Labi Kousoulis requesting an official apology from the comedian.2 Aside from the attention garnered by the irreverent treatment of the disaster detailed above, the assortment of new scholarship on the disaster and the contemporary responses to it published in 2017 (both locally and internationally) make it clear that the explosion, its victims, and its lasting effects are far from forgotten. The six texts reviewed here highlight the diversity of approaches to, and interpretations of, the records of this historic disaster: John Bacon’s The Great Halifax Explosion: A World War I Story of Treachery, Tragedy and Extraordinary Heroism; Keith Cuthbertson’s The Halifax Explosion: Canada’s Worst Disaster; David Sutherland’s “We Harbor No Evil Design”: Rehabilitation Efforts After the Halifax Explosion of 1917; Michael Dupuis’s Bearing Witness: Journalists, Record Keepers and the 1917 Halifax Explosion; Dan Soucoup’s Explosion in Halifax Harbour, 1917; and Susan Dodd’s The Halifax Explosion: The Apocalypse of Samuel H. Prince.3 These texts are academic or popular works that have been authored by three historians, two journalists, and a political theorist. Uncommon though it may be","PeriodicalId":36377,"journal":{"name":"Regioni","volume":"120 1","pages":"151 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regioni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ACA.2018.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IN APRIL 2018, ACTOR ROB LOWE appeared on the American talk show Jimmy Kimmel Live to promote his most recent movie. In the segment he adlibbed about the Halifax Explosion and explained that he had convinced the movie’s producers to change his character’s nickname from “The Explosion” to “The Halifax Explosion.” Lowe went on to (mis)educate the host of the show, Jimmy Kimmel, about the details of the Halifax Explosion, and between the two men it was implied that the explosion was a forgotten historical event. Only four months earlier, on 6 December 2017, following months of preparation and public events leading up to the anniversary, the centenary of the Halifax Explosion was commemorated. The response from Canadians to the segment on Jimmy Kimmel Live was swift and largely condemnatory of both Lowe’s inaccurate recounting of the details of the disaster and the conclusion reached by the men that it was acceptable to laugh about the disaster now because it was 100 years ago and the victims have been “forgotten.”1 In the days that followed the story was picked up by provincial and national news outlets, first as a quirky interest piece but soon the focus shifted to popular outrage that the two men had joked about a tragedy that, despite being a century in the past, is still seen by many as integral to the identity of Haligonians. The short-lived scandal seemed to culminate in a letter being sent from Nova Scotian provincial labour minister Labi Kousoulis requesting an official apology from the comedian.2 Aside from the attention garnered by the irreverent treatment of the disaster detailed above, the assortment of new scholarship on the disaster and the contemporary responses to it published in 2017 (both locally and internationally) make it clear that the explosion, its victims, and its lasting effects are far from forgotten. The six texts reviewed here highlight the diversity of approaches to, and interpretations of, the records of this historic disaster: John Bacon’s The Great Halifax Explosion: A World War I Story of Treachery, Tragedy and Extraordinary Heroism; Keith Cuthbertson’s The Halifax Explosion: Canada’s Worst Disaster; David Sutherland’s “We Harbor No Evil Design”: Rehabilitation Efforts After the Halifax Explosion of 1917; Michael Dupuis’s Bearing Witness: Journalists, Record Keepers and the 1917 Halifax Explosion; Dan Soucoup’s Explosion in Halifax Harbour, 1917; and Susan Dodd’s The Halifax Explosion: The Apocalypse of Samuel H. Prince.3 These texts are academic or popular works that have been authored by three historians, two journalists, and a political theorist. Uncommon though it may be
哈利法克斯爆炸的新方法
2018年4月,演员罗伯·洛出现在美国脱口秀《吉米·坎摩尔秀》上,宣传他的最新电影。在这段视频中,他即兴讲述了哈利法克斯大爆炸,并解释说他已经说服了电影制片人把他的角色昵称从“大爆炸”改为“哈利法克斯大爆炸”。洛继续(错误地)教育节目主持人吉米·坎摩尔关于哈利法克斯爆炸的细节,两人之间暗示爆炸是一个被遗忘的历史事件。就在四个月前,即2017年12月6日,经过数月的筹备和公众活动,哈利法克斯爆炸一百周年纪念活动正式举行。加拿大人对吉米·坎摩尔现场秀(Jimmy Kimmel Live)的片段反应迅速,主要是谴责洛对灾难细节的不准确叙述,以及两人得出的结论:现在嘲笑灾难是可以接受的,因为这是100年前的事了,受害者已经被“遗忘”了。接下来的几天里,这个故事被省级和全国性的新闻媒体报道,起初是作为一篇古怪的趣味文章,但很快焦点就转移到了公众的愤怒上,因为这两个人拿一场悲剧开玩笑,尽管已经过去了一个世纪,但许多人仍然认为这场悲剧与哈利戈尼人的身份密不可分。新斯科舍省劳工部长拉比·库苏利斯寄来一封信,要求这位喜剧演员正式道歉,这一短暂的丑闻似乎达到了高潮除了上面详述的对灾难不敬的处理所引起的关注之外,2017年出版的关于灾难的各种新学术研究以及当代对灾难的反应(包括本地和国际)清楚地表明,爆炸,其受害者及其持久影响远未被遗忘。这里回顾的六篇文章突出了对这一历史性灾难记录的不同方法和解释:约翰·培根的《哈利法克斯大爆炸:第一次世界大战的背叛、悲剧和非凡英雄主义故事》;Keith Cuthbertson的《哈利法克斯大爆炸:加拿大最严重的灾难》;大卫·萨瑟兰的《我们没有邪恶的设计》:1917年哈利法克斯爆炸后的重建努力迈克尔·迪普伊斯的《见证:记者、记录保持者和1917年哈利法克斯爆炸》丹·苏库特的《哈利法克斯港爆炸》,1917年;苏珊·多德的《哈利法克斯大爆炸:塞缪尔·h·普林斯的启示录》。这些文本是由三位历史学家、两位记者和一位政治理论家撰写的学术或通俗作品。虽然这可能是不寻常的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regioni
Regioni Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信