Offline Signature Recognition via Convolutional Neural Network and Multiple Classifiers

F. Alsuhimat, F. Mohamad
{"title":"Offline Signature Recognition via Convolutional Neural Network and Multiple Classifiers","authors":"F. Alsuhimat, F. Mohamad","doi":"10.5121/ijnsa.2022.14103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important processes used by companies to safeguard the security of information and prevent it from unauthorized access or penetration is the signature process. As businesses and individuals move into the digital age, a computerized system that can discern between genuine and faked signatures is crucial for protecting people's authorization and determining what permissions they have. In this paper, we used Pre-Trained CNN for extracts features from genuine and forged signatures, and three widely used classification algorithms, SVM (Support Vector Machine), NB (Naive Bayes) and KNN (k-nearest neighbors), these algorithms are compared to calculate the run time, classification error, classification loss, and accuracy for test-set consist of signature images (genuine and forgery). Three classifiers have been applied using (UTSig) dataset; where run time, classification error, classification loss and accuracy were calculated for each classifier in the verification phase, the results showed that the SVM and KNN got the best accuracy (76.21), while the SVM got the best run time (0.13) result among other classifiers, therefore the SVM classifier got the best result among the other classifiers in terms of our measures.","PeriodicalId":93303,"journal":{"name":"International journal of network security & its applications","volume":"201 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of network security & its applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2022.14103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the most important processes used by companies to safeguard the security of information and prevent it from unauthorized access or penetration is the signature process. As businesses and individuals move into the digital age, a computerized system that can discern between genuine and faked signatures is crucial for protecting people's authorization and determining what permissions they have. In this paper, we used Pre-Trained CNN for extracts features from genuine and forged signatures, and three widely used classification algorithms, SVM (Support Vector Machine), NB (Naive Bayes) and KNN (k-nearest neighbors), these algorithms are compared to calculate the run time, classification error, classification loss, and accuracy for test-set consist of signature images (genuine and forgery). Three classifiers have been applied using (UTSig) dataset; where run time, classification error, classification loss and accuracy were calculated for each classifier in the verification phase, the results showed that the SVM and KNN got the best accuracy (76.21), while the SVM got the best run time (0.13) result among other classifiers, therefore the SVM classifier got the best result among the other classifiers in terms of our measures.
基于卷积神经网络和多分类器的离线签名识别
公司用来保护信息安全并防止未经授权的访问或渗透的最重要的过程之一是签名过程。随着企业和个人进入数字时代,一个能够辨别真假签名的计算机化系统对于保护人们的授权和确定他们拥有的权限至关重要。本文利用Pre-Trained CNN对真伪签名进行特征提取,并与支持向量机(SVM)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)和k近邻(KNN)三种常用的分类算法进行比较,计算由真伪签名图像组成的测试集的运行时间、分类误差、分类损失和准确率。使用(UTSig)数据集应用了三种分类器;在验证阶段,计算了每个分类器的运行时间、分类误差、分类损失和准确率,结果表明SVM和KNN在所有分类器中准确率最高(76.21),而SVM在所有分类器中运行时间最高(0.13),因此在我们的度量中,SVM分类器在所有分类器中获得了最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信