Traumatic Lesser Metatarsal Fractures: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Q4 Medicine
C. Zale, M. Cusí, P. Ryan
{"title":"Traumatic Lesser Metatarsal Fractures: A Case Series and Review of the Literature","authors":"C. Zale, M. Cusí, P. Ryan","doi":"10.3390/osteology2020009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: metatarsal fractures are a commonly encountered musculoskeletal injury. Scant literature exists to support current treatment guidelines and few studies describe the functional or occupational outcomes of patients with lesser metatarsal fractures. The purpose of this study is to describe occupational outcomes for traumatic lesser metatarsal fractures in relation to current treatment guidelines. Methods: a retrospective review of metatarsal fractures in adult military patients 18 years and older was performed. Data included: patient demographics, fracture angulation and displacement, treatment modality, associated injuries, rate of return to active duty, requirement for additional surgeries, ability to run a 2-mile physical fitness test, and presence of permanent activity limitations. Treatment guideline criteria were applied and compared with the occupational outcomes measured. Results: 38 fractures were included. The mean age was 27.2 ± 7.8 (19–48). Here, 28 fractures were initially treated non-operatively. Fractures selected for non-operative treatment had a mean displacement of 1.7 +/− 1.1 mm and a mean angulation of 3.3 +/− 3.5° at initial presentation. Fractures selected for operative treatment had a mean displacement of 4.5 +/− 2.4 mm and a mean angulation of 15.7 +/− 13.8° at initial presentation. The return to run rate was 89% in non-operatively treated patients and 50% in operatively treated patients (p = 0.02). Non-operative patients returned to running at a mean of 119 +/− 103 days and operative patients returned to running at a mean of 306 +/− 191 days (p = 0.0039). 50% of operatively treated patients and 11% of non-operatively treated patents were unable to remain in the military due to their metatarsal fractures. Conclusions: patients treated non-operatively were more likely to return to running and returned to running sooner than operatively treated patients. Current treatment guidelines could not be supported or refuted based upon the study results. The occupational and functional outcomes demonstrated in this study may assist surgeons in counseling patients on their planned treatment and anticipated recovery following a lesser metatarsal fracture.","PeriodicalId":36674,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Osteology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Osteology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2020009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: metatarsal fractures are a commonly encountered musculoskeletal injury. Scant literature exists to support current treatment guidelines and few studies describe the functional or occupational outcomes of patients with lesser metatarsal fractures. The purpose of this study is to describe occupational outcomes for traumatic lesser metatarsal fractures in relation to current treatment guidelines. Methods: a retrospective review of metatarsal fractures in adult military patients 18 years and older was performed. Data included: patient demographics, fracture angulation and displacement, treatment modality, associated injuries, rate of return to active duty, requirement for additional surgeries, ability to run a 2-mile physical fitness test, and presence of permanent activity limitations. Treatment guideline criteria were applied and compared with the occupational outcomes measured. Results: 38 fractures were included. The mean age was 27.2 ± 7.8 (19–48). Here, 28 fractures were initially treated non-operatively. Fractures selected for non-operative treatment had a mean displacement of 1.7 +/− 1.1 mm and a mean angulation of 3.3 +/− 3.5° at initial presentation. Fractures selected for operative treatment had a mean displacement of 4.5 +/− 2.4 mm and a mean angulation of 15.7 +/− 13.8° at initial presentation. The return to run rate was 89% in non-operatively treated patients and 50% in operatively treated patients (p = 0.02). Non-operative patients returned to running at a mean of 119 +/− 103 days and operative patients returned to running at a mean of 306 +/− 191 days (p = 0.0039). 50% of operatively treated patients and 11% of non-operatively treated patents were unable to remain in the military due to their metatarsal fractures. Conclusions: patients treated non-operatively were more likely to return to running and returned to running sooner than operatively treated patients. Current treatment guidelines could not be supported or refuted based upon the study results. The occupational and functional outcomes demonstrated in this study may assist surgeons in counseling patients on their planned treatment and anticipated recovery following a lesser metatarsal fracture.
外伤性小跖骨骨折:病例系列及文献回顾
背景:跖骨骨折是一种常见的肌肉骨骼损伤。很少有文献支持目前的治疗指南,也很少有研究描述小跖骨骨折患者的功能或职业结局。本研究的目的是描述创伤性小跖骨骨折的职业结局与当前治疗指南的关系。方法:对18岁及以上成年军人的跖骨骨折进行回顾性分析。数据包括:患者人口统计数据、骨折角度和移位、治疗方式、相关损伤、重返现役率、额外手术需求、进行2英里体能测试的能力以及是否存在永久性活动限制。应用治疗指南标准并与测量的职业结果进行比较。结果:共纳入38例骨折。平均年龄27.2±7.8(19-48)岁。在这里,28例骨折最初采用非手术治疗。选择非手术治疗的骨折在初次出现时平均移位1.7 +/ - 1.1 mm,平均成角3.3 +/ - 3.5°。选择手术治疗的骨折在初始表现时平均位移为4.5 +/ - 2.4 mm,平均角度为15.7 +/ - 13.8°。非手术治疗组的复发率为89%,手术治疗组为50% (p = 0.02)。非手术患者恢复跑步平均为119 +/ - 103天,手术患者恢复跑步平均为306 +/ - 191天(p = 0.0039)。50%的手术治疗患者和11%的非手术治疗患者由于跖骨骨折无法继续留在军队。结论:非手术治疗的患者比手术治疗的患者更有可能恢复跑步,并且恢复跑步的时间更快。目前的治疗指南不能根据研究结果来支持或反驳。本研究显示的职业和功能结果可以帮助外科医生对小跖骨骨折后患者的计划治疗和预期恢复进行咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Osteology
Clinical Osteology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信