Right to work: Dáil narratives on asylum

A. Maillot
{"title":"Right to work: Dáil narratives on asylum","authors":"A. Maillot","doi":"10.18193/sah.v4i2.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In May 2017, the Supreme Court ruling that the ban preventing asylum seekers from working was unconstitutional triggered a number of debates in the Dail, and the government was forced to introduce new legislation. The 'right to work' came into effect one year later, and in the meantime, TDs from all sides of the Chamber discussed the pros and cons of allowing those whose applications for refugee status is still pending to seek employment and to leave the Direct Provision centres where they have been housed since the system was introduced almost twenty years previously, in 1999. This paper seeks to analyse the political discourse on the right to work for asylum seekers, since the debate extends from the late 1990s right up to the current situation. After having contextualised the issue, both internationally and in Ireland, it will explore the manner in which this debate has been framed in Dail Eireann, analysing the arguments put forward, either in favour or against, access to the labour market for asylum seekers.","PeriodicalId":31069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Arts and Humanities","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Arts and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18193/sah.v4i2.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In May 2017, the Supreme Court ruling that the ban preventing asylum seekers from working was unconstitutional triggered a number of debates in the Dail, and the government was forced to introduce new legislation. The 'right to work' came into effect one year later, and in the meantime, TDs from all sides of the Chamber discussed the pros and cons of allowing those whose applications for refugee status is still pending to seek employment and to leave the Direct Provision centres where they have been housed since the system was introduced almost twenty years previously, in 1999. This paper seeks to analyse the political discourse on the right to work for asylum seekers, since the debate extends from the late 1990s right up to the current situation. After having contextualised the issue, both internationally and in Ireland, it will explore the manner in which this debate has been framed in Dail Eireann, analysing the arguments put forward, either in favour or against, access to the labour market for asylum seekers.
工作的权利:Dáil关于庇护的叙述
2017年5月,最高法院裁定禁止寻求庇护者工作的禁令违宪,引发了国会的多次辩论,政府被迫引入新的立法。一年后,“工作权”开始生效。与此同时,来自商会各方的议员讨论了允许那些仍未申请难民身份的人找工作和离开直接供应中心的利弊,自1999年该制度实施以来,他们一直被安置在那里。本文试图分析关于寻求庇护者工作权利的政治话语,因为辩论从20世纪90年代末一直延伸到目前的情况。在将这一问题置于国际和爱尔兰的背景之下之后,它将探讨爱尔兰议会中这一辩论的框架,分析提出的支持或反对寻求庇护者进入劳动力市场的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信