{"title":"The report of technical-scientific or medico-legal finding and its correlation with the judicial expertise report","authors":"Artiom Pilat","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the criminal process, without the judges’ rigorous knowledge of the criminal act, actually produced, of the perpetrator’s person, of the objective circumstances that preceded, accompanied or followed the commission of the crime, of the subjective circumstances, as well as without clear knowledge of other circumstances. related to the case, the administration of justice is sometimes impossible. In order to ascertain the objective truth in the criminal cases of the factual data in the vast majority of cases it is necessary to apply special knowledge. In all the cases in which the expertise is spoken, a research carried out by the judicial expert is considered in order to clarify some questions that require special knowledge in one area or another. The most frequently asked questions are in the field of science, technique, art or craft. The law on judicial expertise and the status of the judicial expert defines judicial expertise as a scientific-practical research activity, carried out in the civil, criminal or contraventional process (hereinafter referred to as the judicial process) in order to find out the truth by carrying out methodical investigations with the application of special knowledge and technical-scientific procedures for drawing some argued conclusions about certain facts, circumstances, material objects, phenomena and processes, the human body and psyche, which can serve as evidence in a judicial process","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the criminal process, without the judges’ rigorous knowledge of the criminal act, actually produced, of the perpetrator’s person, of the objective circumstances that preceded, accompanied or followed the commission of the crime, of the subjective circumstances, as well as without clear knowledge of other circumstances. related to the case, the administration of justice is sometimes impossible. In order to ascertain the objective truth in the criminal cases of the factual data in the vast majority of cases it is necessary to apply special knowledge. In all the cases in which the expertise is spoken, a research carried out by the judicial expert is considered in order to clarify some questions that require special knowledge in one area or another. The most frequently asked questions are in the field of science, technique, art or craft. The law on judicial expertise and the status of the judicial expert defines judicial expertise as a scientific-practical research activity, carried out in the civil, criminal or contraventional process (hereinafter referred to as the judicial process) in order to find out the truth by carrying out methodical investigations with the application of special knowledge and technical-scientific procedures for drawing some argued conclusions about certain facts, circumstances, material objects, phenomena and processes, the human body and psyche, which can serve as evidence in a judicial process