A postsecular agonism? Religion and metaphysics in Chantal Mouffe

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
J. Gillin
{"title":"A postsecular agonism? Religion and metaphysics in Chantal Mouffe","authors":"J. Gillin","doi":"10.1080/0039338X.2021.2020899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the place of religion and metaphysics in the agonistic political theory of Chantal Mouffe. The first section introduces Mouffe’s agonistic project and points to its normative postsecular implications. The second section presents her key engagements with religion and shows a development in her thought from a more restrictive secularist model toward a more open approach to religion in the public sphere. I suggest that an uncritical adoption of a modern view of religion is a hindrance to her account and in tension with her agonistic assumptions. In the final section I examine how Mouffe deals with the limits of pluralism and religious interventions in politics and argue that her agonistic theory has insufficiently recognized the inescapability of faith and metaphysics in political theorizing. I suggest that adopting a more postsecular agonism would promote rather than squash pluralism and increase the terrain of political contestation and democratic possibilities.","PeriodicalId":41136,"journal":{"name":"Studia Theologica-Nordic Journal of Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Theologica-Nordic Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2021.2020899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the place of religion and metaphysics in the agonistic political theory of Chantal Mouffe. The first section introduces Mouffe’s agonistic project and points to its normative postsecular implications. The second section presents her key engagements with religion and shows a development in her thought from a more restrictive secularist model toward a more open approach to religion in the public sphere. I suggest that an uncritical adoption of a modern view of religion is a hindrance to her account and in tension with her agonistic assumptions. In the final section I examine how Mouffe deals with the limits of pluralism and religious interventions in politics and argue that her agonistic theory has insufficiently recognized the inescapability of faith and metaphysics in political theorizing. I suggest that adopting a more postsecular agonism would promote rather than squash pluralism and increase the terrain of political contestation and democratic possibilities.
后世俗的斗争?尚塔尔·墨菲的宗教与形而上学
本文考察了宗教和形而上学在尚塔尔·墨菲的斗争政治理论中的地位。第一部分介绍了墨菲的斗争项目,并指出其规范性的后世俗含义。第二部分介绍了她与宗教的主要接触,并展示了她的思想从一个更严格的世俗主义模式到一个更开放的公共领域的宗教方法的发展。我认为,不加批判地采用现代宗教观对她的叙述是一种阻碍,并与她的激烈假设相矛盾。在最后一节中,我考察了墨菲如何处理多元主义和宗教干预政治的局限性,并认为她的斗争理论没有充分认识到信仰和形而上学在政治理论化中的不可避免性。我认为,采取一种更加后世俗的斗争主义将促进而不是压制多元主义,并增加政治竞争的范围和民主的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信