Chinese mirrors from the burials of the nomads of Eastern Europe of the second half of the 1st millennium BC-first centuries AD: Typology, chronology, distribution and technology of manufacture

Mikhail Treister , Irina Ravich
{"title":"Chinese mirrors from the burials of the nomads of Eastern Europe of the second half of the 1st millennium BC-first centuries AD: Typology, chronology, distribution and technology of manufacture","authors":"Mikhail Treister ,&nbsp;Irina Ravich","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article is devoted to the Chinese mirrors found in the burials of the nomads of Asian Sarmatia. The typology and chronology of mirrors is presented, the earliest of which dates back to the period of the Warring States, but most of them, dating back to the 1st century BC – 2nd century AD. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st century BC – the first half of the 1st century AD the number of Chinese items in Asiatic Sarmatia is increasing. They are represented, among others, by two mirrors of the Western Han type, which come from the Lower Volga and Don regions; they are not known in the South Urals. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st– the first half of the 2nd century AD the Chinese mirrors are much more common. As before, they are not known in the Urals, but they are also represented in the Kuban and Lower Volga, and especially in the Lower Don region. In the burials of the late Sarmatian period of the late 2nd – middle / second half of the 3rd century AD Chinese mirrors are relatively abundant in the Urals, where the mapping of finds allows us to distinguish two local groups (1 – South Urals: Lebedevka and burial grounds in the Ilek river basin; 2 - South Bashkiria, interfluve of the Sakmara and the Urals rivers, and the Trans-Urals), while further to the west – in the Lower Volga and Don regions, they generally ceased to fall, only two mirrors are known outside the South Urals – in Trans-Kuban and Central Ciscaucasia. The issue of deliberate damage to mirrors is specially considered.</p><p>Is it possible to consider the Chinese bronze mirrors as trade items? If we assume that they belonged to the items of trade along the Silk Road, then two conclusions following from the dating of the finds should be taken into consideration. Firstly, these mirrors were not distributed to the ancient centers of the North Pontic area and further to the territory of the Roman provinces. Thus, the way of the mirrors ended in the steppe. Moreover, starting from the second half of the 2<sup>nd</sup> century AD (late Sarmatian culture) Chinese mirrors cease to fall to the west of the Urals – their finds are unknown neither in the Lower Volga region, nor on the Don. This means that the connection between the distribution of the Chinese mirrors and the functioning of the northern branch of the Silk Road is unlikely.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 24-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667136021000054/pdfft?md5=dffc38c82c8692dc89e64abf42a88fc1&pid=1-s2.0-S2667136021000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667136021000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article is devoted to the Chinese mirrors found in the burials of the nomads of Asian Sarmatia. The typology and chronology of mirrors is presented, the earliest of which dates back to the period of the Warring States, but most of them, dating back to the 1st century BC – 2nd century AD. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st century BC – the first half of the 1st century AD the number of Chinese items in Asiatic Sarmatia is increasing. They are represented, among others, by two mirrors of the Western Han type, which come from the Lower Volga and Don regions; they are not known in the South Urals. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st– the first half of the 2nd century AD the Chinese mirrors are much more common. As before, they are not known in the Urals, but they are also represented in the Kuban and Lower Volga, and especially in the Lower Don region. In the burials of the late Sarmatian period of the late 2nd – middle / second half of the 3rd century AD Chinese mirrors are relatively abundant in the Urals, where the mapping of finds allows us to distinguish two local groups (1 – South Urals: Lebedevka and burial grounds in the Ilek river basin; 2 - South Bashkiria, interfluve of the Sakmara and the Urals rivers, and the Trans-Urals), while further to the west – in the Lower Volga and Don regions, they generally ceased to fall, only two mirrors are known outside the South Urals – in Trans-Kuban and Central Ciscaucasia. The issue of deliberate damage to mirrors is specially considered.

Is it possible to consider the Chinese bronze mirrors as trade items? If we assume that they belonged to the items of trade along the Silk Road, then two conclusions following from the dating of the finds should be taken into consideration. Firstly, these mirrors were not distributed to the ancient centers of the North Pontic area and further to the territory of the Roman provinces. Thus, the way of the mirrors ended in the steppe. Moreover, starting from the second half of the 2nd century AD (late Sarmatian culture) Chinese mirrors cease to fall to the west of the Urals – their finds are unknown neither in the Lower Volga region, nor on the Don. This means that the connection between the distribution of the Chinese mirrors and the functioning of the northern branch of the Silk Road is unlikely.

公元前1千年下半叶-公元1世纪东欧游牧民族墓葬中的中国镜子:类型学、年代、分布和制造技术
这篇文章专门介绍在亚洲萨尔马提亚游牧民族的墓葬中发现的中国镜子。介绍了镜子的类型和年代,其中最早的可以追溯到战国时期,但大多数可以追溯到公元前1世纪至公元2世纪。在公元前1世纪下半叶至公元1世纪上半叶的建筑群中,亚洲萨尔马提亚的中国物品数量不断增加。其中,有两个来自伏尔加河下游和顿河地区的西汉式镜子;它们在南乌拉尔地区并不为人所知。在公元1世纪下半叶至2世纪上半叶的建筑群中,中国镜子更为常见。和以前一样,他们在乌拉尔不为人所知,但在库班和下伏尔加河地区,特别是在下顿河地区,他们也有代表。在公元2世纪晚期至3世纪中下半叶萨尔马时期的墓葬中,乌拉尔地区的中国镜子相对丰富,通过对这些发现的映射,我们可以区分出两个地方群体(1 -南乌拉尔:列别德夫卡和伊力克河流域的墓葬地;2 -南巴什基里亚,萨克马拉河和乌拉尔河的交汇处,以及外乌拉尔河),而在更远的西部-在伏尔加河下游和顿河地区,它们基本上停止了下降,只有两个镜子在南乌拉尔以外-在库班河和中高加索。特别考虑了故意损坏镜子的问题。中国的铜镜可以考虑作为贸易项目吗?如果我们假设它们属于丝绸之路沿线的贸易物品,那么从这些发现的年代得出的两个结论应该考虑进去。首先,这些镜子并没有分布到北本蒂克地区的古代中心,也没有分布到罗马行省的领土上。因此,镜子的道路在草原上结束了。此外,从公元2世纪下半叶(萨尔马西亚文化晚期)开始,中国的镜子就不再落在乌拉尔山脉以西了——它们的发现既不在伏尔加河下游地区,也不在顿河地区。这意味着中国镜子的分布与丝绸之路北部分支的运作之间的联系是不太可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信