Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Karya Cipta Lagu “Hilang” Atas Tindakan Perbanyakan Atas Karya Cipta Tanpa Perjanjian Lisensi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 192 PK/Pdt.Sus/2010)

Khairil Fahmi
{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Karya Cipta Lagu “Hilang” Atas Tindakan Perbanyakan Atas Karya Cipta Tanpa Perjanjian Lisensi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 192 PK/Pdt.Sus/2010)","authors":"Khairil Fahmi","doi":"10.30743/jhk.v19i1.1910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of human creativity in creating a work that can have economic value requires legal protection. This protection is very important to encourage the creative enthusiasm of people. There are some basic principles of the copyright law protection of the sound recordings results in its protection that need to be considered, such as what is protected by copyright is an idea that has been tangible and original. As a result of law enforcement efforts against piracy song or music copyright is regulated in the Article 72 where the law enforcement efforts by the government by providing criminal sanctions and civil sanctions with claims for compensation, the Supreme Court considers the reasons of the Petitioner for Review that these reasons cannot be justified, because the judex juris did not commit an error or a real mistake in deciding the a quo case . In general, the forms of Song or Music copyright piracy are divided into several categories, namely Pirate, Couterfeit and Bootleging. The motive for the piracy is for commercial interests in the form of financial gain. The role of the government in law enforcement dealing with piracy is to provide strict sanctions in the form of confiscation and destruction of goods resulting from Copyright piracy carried out by the government. Keywords: Legal Protection, Copyright, Songs, Propagation Actions, License.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v19i1.1910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of human creativity in creating a work that can have economic value requires legal protection. This protection is very important to encourage the creative enthusiasm of people. There are some basic principles of the copyright law protection of the sound recordings results in its protection that need to be considered, such as what is protected by copyright is an idea that has been tangible and original. As a result of law enforcement efforts against piracy song or music copyright is regulated in the Article 72 where the law enforcement efforts by the government by providing criminal sanctions and civil sanctions with claims for compensation, the Supreme Court considers the reasons of the Petitioner for Review that these reasons cannot be justified, because the judex juris did not commit an error or a real mistake in deciding the a quo case . In general, the forms of Song or Music copyright piracy are divided into several categories, namely Pirate, Couterfeit and Bootleging. The motive for the piracy is for commercial interests in the form of financial gain. The role of the government in law enforcement dealing with piracy is to provide strict sanctions in the form of confiscation and destruction of goods resulting from Copyright piracy carried out by the government. Keywords: Legal Protection, Copyright, Songs, Propagation Actions, License.
在创造具有经济价值的作品时,人类创造力的发展需要法律保护。这种保护对于激发人们的创作热情是非常重要的。版权法保护录音结果的一些基本原则需要考虑,例如受版权保护的是有形的和原创的想法。由于针对盗版歌曲或音乐版权的执法努力是在第72条中规定的,其中政府的执法努力通过提供刑事制裁和民事制裁并要求赔偿,最高法院认为复审请愿人的理由是这些理由不能成立,因为法官在决定现状案件时没有犯错误或真正的错误。一般来说,歌曲或音乐版权的盗版形式分为几类,即盗版,假冒和非法贩卖。盗版的动机是以经济利益为形式的商业利益。政府在处理盗版问题的执法中所扮演的角色是提供严格的制裁,没收和销毁由政府执行的盗版造成的商品。关键词:法律保护,版权,歌曲,传播行为,许可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信