EFFECT OF COMPACTION AT DIFFERENT ENERGY LEVELS ON THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF STABILIZED SOILS

Temitayo Olamide Ale, Olabode Olabanji Olofinyo, Oluremi Success Odebode, David Shola Esan
{"title":"EFFECT OF COMPACTION AT DIFFERENT ENERGY LEVELS ON THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF STABILIZED SOILS","authors":"Temitayo Olamide Ale, Olabode Olabanji Olofinyo, Oluremi Success Odebode, David Shola Esan","doi":"10.26480/mjg.01.2022.29.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is aimed at evaluating the influence of compaction (at different energy levels) on the geotechnical properties of stabilized soils. To achieve this, four bulk soil samples (BDL1, BDL2 BDL3 & BDT) consisting of termite reworked soils and residual lateritic soils were collected at New Stadium Road, Awo hall, University of Ibadan, Nigeria at a depth of 2m for strength tests and at depths of 1m, 1.5m & 2m for index tests. Geotechnical analysis (index tests and strength tests) and geochemical analysis (X-ray Diffraction) were carried out on the sampled soils. The study revealed that the mineral constituents of the sampled soils are quartz, kaolinite and hematite; with the termite-reworked soil richer in kaolinite content than the quartz schist derived soil with about 125% increase. The values of index tests for both soils met the required Nigeria specification for good soil with termite reworked soil performing better. The values of specific gravity for both soils are close suggesting similar origin. AASHTO classification put termite-reworked soil within the range of A-2-7 (good rating) while most of the residual soil samples fall within A-7-5 to A-7-6 range (fair to poor rating). The stabilisation of residual lateritic soil using termite-reworked soil as stabiliser brought about increase in the values of maximum dry density, uncured unconfined compressive strength as well as the sun-cured unconfined compressive strength of the studied soil. The influence of stabilisation using termite-reworked soil was strongest at the highest level of compaction ((30%) of termite-reworked soil with the weight of residual soil). There also exist a fairly strong positive correlation between the amount of termite reworked soil and energy of compaction and between the uncured and sun-cured unconfined compressive strength was plotted against the number of blows for BDL1, BDL2 and BDL3 respectively. In sum, these stabilised soils are suitable for foundation and landfills materials.","PeriodicalId":53054,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26480/mjg.01.2022.29.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study is aimed at evaluating the influence of compaction (at different energy levels) on the geotechnical properties of stabilized soils. To achieve this, four bulk soil samples (BDL1, BDL2 BDL3 & BDT) consisting of termite reworked soils and residual lateritic soils were collected at New Stadium Road, Awo hall, University of Ibadan, Nigeria at a depth of 2m for strength tests and at depths of 1m, 1.5m & 2m for index tests. Geotechnical analysis (index tests and strength tests) and geochemical analysis (X-ray Diffraction) were carried out on the sampled soils. The study revealed that the mineral constituents of the sampled soils are quartz, kaolinite and hematite; with the termite-reworked soil richer in kaolinite content than the quartz schist derived soil with about 125% increase. The values of index tests for both soils met the required Nigeria specification for good soil with termite reworked soil performing better. The values of specific gravity for both soils are close suggesting similar origin. AASHTO classification put termite-reworked soil within the range of A-2-7 (good rating) while most of the residual soil samples fall within A-7-5 to A-7-6 range (fair to poor rating). The stabilisation of residual lateritic soil using termite-reworked soil as stabiliser brought about increase in the values of maximum dry density, uncured unconfined compressive strength as well as the sun-cured unconfined compressive strength of the studied soil. The influence of stabilisation using termite-reworked soil was strongest at the highest level of compaction ((30%) of termite-reworked soil with the weight of residual soil). There also exist a fairly strong positive correlation between the amount of termite reworked soil and energy of compaction and between the uncured and sun-cured unconfined compressive strength was plotted against the number of blows for BDL1, BDL2 and BDL3 respectively. In sum, these stabilised soils are suitable for foundation and landfills materials.
不同能量水平压实对稳定土岩土力学性质的影响
本研究旨在评估压实(在不同能量水平下)对稳定土岩土力学特性的影响。为了实现这一目标,在尼日利亚伊巴丹大学Awo hall的New Stadium Road收集了四个由白蚁改造土和残余红土组成的散装土样本(BDL1, BDL2, BDL3和BDT),深度为2m进行强度测试,深度为1m, 1.5m和2m进行指数测试。对取样土壤进行了岩土分析(指标测试和强度测试)和地球化学分析(x射线衍射)。研究表明,样品土壤的矿物成分主要为石英、高岭石和赤铁矿;白蚁改造土壤高岭石含量较石英片岩土高约125%。两种土壤的指标试验值均符合尼日利亚优良土壤规范要求,白蚁改造土壤表现更好。两种土壤的比重值相近,表明其来源相似。在AASHTO分类中,白蚁改造后的土壤处于A-2-7级(良好等级)范围内,而大部分残留土壤样品处于A-7-5至A-7-6级(中等至较差等级)范围内。利用白蚁改造土作为稳定剂对残余红土进行稳定处理,使研究土的最大干密度、未固化无侧限抗压强度和晒固化无侧限抗压强度均有所增加。在最高的压实水平(占残余土重量的30%)下,使用白蚁改造土进行稳定的影响最强。在BDL1、BDL2和BDL3的击打次数中,分别绘制了未固化和晒固化的无侧限抗压强度与白蚁改造土的数量和压实能量之间的正相关关系。总之,这些稳定的土壤适用于地基和垃圾填埋材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信