THE PRINCIPLE OF THE INEVITABILITY OF PUNISHMENT IN PENAL ENFORCEMENT LAW: FROM DECLARATION TO THE POSSIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION

IF 0.2 Q3 LAW
S. Sheveleva, V. A. Mozhaikina
{"title":"THE PRINCIPLE OF THE INEVITABILITY OF PUNISHMENT IN PENAL ENFORCEMENT LAW: FROM DECLARATION TO THE POSSIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION","authors":"S. Sheveleva, V. A. Mozhaikina","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2021-54-722-753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the paper deals with the doctrinal principle of the inevitability of punishment and focuses on the possibility of implementing it in legal relations under penal enforcement law. The purpose of the paper is to identify how this interdisciplinary principle is respected in the enforcement of criminal sentences, and to propose mechanisms for its implementation. The study employs such methods as description, observation, statistical analysis, documentary analysis, induction, analogy, and thought experiment. Results: the paper reveals the fact that within the existing system of measures of negative and positive impact on the behavior of convicted persons, it is practically impossible to ensure the principle of the inevitability of punishment being implemented when it comes to sentences that are not related to isolation from society. Implementation of this principle in the execution of punishments related to isolation from society is not of legal but of organizational nature. Conclusions: the inability to execute a punishment in strict accordance with the requirements of the law leads to the loss of the deterrent value of punishment. When punishment is not related to isolation from society, convicts do not seek to serve the imposed punishment in strict accordance with the court verdict. As to the cases of serving a sentence related to isolation from society, there is a problem of unclear conditions for taking the most significant incentive measures in relation to a convicted person, such as substitution of the unserved part of the sentence and parole. The analyzed practice convincingly indicates that even if all the requirements of the law are fulfilled, petitions of convicts remain unsatisfied, while the courts refer to the fact that the goals of the punishment have not yet been achieved. Currently, in criminal and penal enforcement legislation there exist neither positive nor negative effective regulators aimed at facilitating strict and proper execution of the punishment imposed by the court.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2021-54-722-753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: the paper deals with the doctrinal principle of the inevitability of punishment and focuses on the possibility of implementing it in legal relations under penal enforcement law. The purpose of the paper is to identify how this interdisciplinary principle is respected in the enforcement of criminal sentences, and to propose mechanisms for its implementation. The study employs such methods as description, observation, statistical analysis, documentary analysis, induction, analogy, and thought experiment. Results: the paper reveals the fact that within the existing system of measures of negative and positive impact on the behavior of convicted persons, it is practically impossible to ensure the principle of the inevitability of punishment being implemented when it comes to sentences that are not related to isolation from society. Implementation of this principle in the execution of punishments related to isolation from society is not of legal but of organizational nature. Conclusions: the inability to execute a punishment in strict accordance with the requirements of the law leads to the loss of the deterrent value of punishment. When punishment is not related to isolation from society, convicts do not seek to serve the imposed punishment in strict accordance with the court verdict. As to the cases of serving a sentence related to isolation from society, there is a problem of unclear conditions for taking the most significant incentive measures in relation to a convicted person, such as substitution of the unserved part of the sentence and parole. The analyzed practice convincingly indicates that even if all the requirements of the law are fulfilled, petitions of convicts remain unsatisfied, while the courts refer to the fact that the goals of the punishment have not yet been achieved. Currently, in criminal and penal enforcement legislation there exist neither positive nor negative effective regulators aimed at facilitating strict and proper execution of the punishment imposed by the court.
刑法执行中刑罚的必然性原则:从宣告到执行的可能性
导言:本文论述了刑罚必然性的理论原则,重点论述了刑罚必然性在刑事执行法的法律关系中实施的可能性。本文的目的是确定在刑事判决的执行中如何尊重这一跨学科原则,并提出其实施机制。本研究采用描述、观察、统计分析、文献分析、归纳、类比、思维实验等方法。结果:该文件揭示了这样一个事实,即在对被定罪者的行为产生消极和积极影响的现有措施制度内,对于与社会隔离无关的判决,实际上不可能确保执行惩罚的必然性原则。在执行与社会隔离有关的惩罚时执行这一原则不是法律性质的,而是组织性的。结论:不能严格按照法律要求执行刑罚,导致刑罚的威慑价值丧失。如果刑罚与社会隔离无关,罪犯就不会严格按照法院判决服刑。至于与社会隔离有关的服刑案件,存在一个问题,即对被定罪者采取最重要的激励措施的条件不明确,例如替代未服刑部分的刑期和假释。经过分析的实践令人信服地表明,即使法律的所有要求都得到满足,罪犯的请愿仍未得到满足,而法院则指出,惩罚的目标尚未实现。目前,在刑事和刑事执法立法中,既不存在旨在促进严格和适当执行法院所定刑罚的积极或消极有效的监管机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信