An Historical Analysis of Waka Unua and the Māori Sail

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Atholl Anderson
{"title":"An Historical Analysis of Waka Unua and the Māori Sail","authors":"Atholl Anderson","doi":"10.15286/jps.131.1.33-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waka unua, Māori ‘double-hulled canoes’ with rudimentary Oceanic spritsails, have long been considered the most devolved of sailing vessels in East Polynesia, compared to an assumed sophistication of voyaging canoes in the prehistoric colonising era. This traditionalist or conventional hypothesis is discussed with reference to early historical data from New Zealand, including both written descriptions and drawings, according to the conviction that neither is intrinsically more reliable or informative than the other. Analysis of these sources, particularly those that refer to the Moutohorā (Bay of Plenty) canoe observed in 1769, does not support the conventional model. Instead of expedient construction, waka unua hulls were built to a New Zealand-wide pattern. Similarly, instead of an Oceanic spritsail, the Māori sail was an Oceanic double spritsail which had independent spars rather than a fixed mast. It was deployed before the wind and struck in reaching conditions. There is no plausible historical evidence of the Oceanic spritsail or lateen in New Zealand before the 1820s and it is argued that the Oceanic double spritsail was the only sailing rig used in pre-European New Zealand. Some inferences for understanding early East Polynesian voyaging are noted.","PeriodicalId":45869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Polynesian Society","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Polynesian Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15286/jps.131.1.33-70","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Waka unua, Māori ‘double-hulled canoes’ with rudimentary Oceanic spritsails, have long been considered the most devolved of sailing vessels in East Polynesia, compared to an assumed sophistication of voyaging canoes in the prehistoric colonising era. This traditionalist or conventional hypothesis is discussed with reference to early historical data from New Zealand, including both written descriptions and drawings, according to the conviction that neither is intrinsically more reliable or informative than the other. Analysis of these sources, particularly those that refer to the Moutohorā (Bay of Plenty) canoe observed in 1769, does not support the conventional model. Instead of expedient construction, waka unua hulls were built to a New Zealand-wide pattern. Similarly, instead of an Oceanic spritsail, the Māori sail was an Oceanic double spritsail which had independent spars rather than a fixed mast. It was deployed before the wind and struck in reaching conditions. There is no plausible historical evidence of the Oceanic spritsail or lateen in New Zealand before the 1820s and it is argued that the Oceanic double spritsail was the only sailing rig used in pre-European New Zealand. Some inferences for understanding early East Polynesian voyaging are noted.
瓦卡乌努阿和Māori帆的历史分析
Waka unua, Māori“双壳独木舟”,带有原始的海洋帆,长期以来一直被认为是东波利尼西亚最落后的帆船,与史前殖民时代的航行独木舟相比。这种传统主义或传统的假设是根据新西兰的早期历史数据来讨论的,包括书面描述和图纸,根据这样的信念,两者本质上都不可靠或信息比另一个更丰富。对这些资料的分析,特别是对1769年观测到的茂托霍伊(丰盛湾)独木舟的分析,并不支持传统的模型。waka unua的船体不是权宜之计,而是按照新西兰的模式建造的。类似地,Māori帆不是大洋的spritsail,而是大洋的双spritsail,它有独立的桅杆而不是固定的桅杆。它在大风之前部署,并在到达条件时袭击。在19世纪20年代之前,新西兰没有海洋性斜桅帆或三角帆的可信历史证据,有人认为大洋性双斜桅帆是欧洲人之前新西兰唯一使用的帆具。对理解早期东波利尼西亚航海的一些推论作了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信