Analytical performance of CBOC-modulated Galileo E1 signal using sine BOC(1,1) receiver for mass-market applications

E. Lohan
{"title":"Analytical performance of CBOC-modulated Galileo E1 signal using sine BOC(1,1) receiver for mass-market applications","authors":"E. Lohan","doi":"10.1109/PLANS.2010.5507207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Composite Binary Offset Carrier (CBOC) modulation has been selected for the future Galileo signals to be used in mass-market applications. CBOC consists of a superposition of two sine Binary Offset Carrier (BOC) waveforms: a sine BOC(1,1) and a sine BOC(6,1) component. CBOC modulation has higher spectral components than BPSK modulation currently used in GPS, and therefore would require a wider bandwidth than what is currently used in mass-market GPS receivers in order to achieve the full performance. Fortunately, CBOC signals can be processed with a sine BOC(1,1) receiver, with lower bandwidth and sampling frequency needs. This paper analyzes how much deterioration (if any) in terms of tracking accuracy (i.e., code tracking error variance and robustness to multipath) occurs when we process a CBOC signal with a reference sine BOC(1,1) receiver (instead of processing it with a CBOC receiver). The analysis focuses especially on narrowband receiver cases (i.e., front-end double-sided bandwidth lower or equal to 5 MHz), which are the cases of interest in mass-market applications. Analytical closed-form expressions of signal Power Spectral Densities (PSD) are derived by taking into account the rate differences of the two components of CBOC signal, and tracking results are analyzed in terms of tracking error variances and multipath error envelopes.","PeriodicalId":94036,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2010.5507207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Composite Binary Offset Carrier (CBOC) modulation has been selected for the future Galileo signals to be used in mass-market applications. CBOC consists of a superposition of two sine Binary Offset Carrier (BOC) waveforms: a sine BOC(1,1) and a sine BOC(6,1) component. CBOC modulation has higher spectral components than BPSK modulation currently used in GPS, and therefore would require a wider bandwidth than what is currently used in mass-market GPS receivers in order to achieve the full performance. Fortunately, CBOC signals can be processed with a sine BOC(1,1) receiver, with lower bandwidth and sampling frequency needs. This paper analyzes how much deterioration (if any) in terms of tracking accuracy (i.e., code tracking error variance and robustness to multipath) occurs when we process a CBOC signal with a reference sine BOC(1,1) receiver (instead of processing it with a CBOC receiver). The analysis focuses especially on narrowband receiver cases (i.e., front-end double-sided bandwidth lower or equal to 5 MHz), which are the cases of interest in mass-market applications. Analytical closed-form expressions of signal Power Spectral Densities (PSD) are derived by taking into account the rate differences of the two components of CBOC signal, and tracking results are analyzed in terms of tracking error variances and multipath error envelopes.
使用正弦BOC(1,1)接收机的cboc调制伽利略E1信号的分析性能,用于大众市场应用
复合二进制偏置载波(CBOC)调制已被选择用于未来的伽利略信号,用于大众市场应用。CBOC由两个正弦二进制偏移载波(BOC)波形的叠加组成:正弦BOC(1,1)和正弦BOC(6,1)分量。CBOC调制比目前GPS中使用的BPSK调制具有更高的频谱成分,因此需要比目前大众市场GPS接收机中使用的更宽的带宽才能实现全部性能。幸运的是,CBOC信号可以用正弦BOC(1,1)接收器处理,具有较低的带宽和采样频率需求。本文分析了当我们使用参考正弦BOC(1,1)接收器处理CBOC信号(而不是使用CBOC接收器处理)时,在跟踪精度(即代码跟踪误差方差和对多路径的鲁棒性)方面发生了多少恶化(如果有的话)。分析特别侧重于窄带接收器案例(即前端双面带宽低于或等于5兆赫),这是大众市场应用感兴趣的案例。考虑CBOC信号两分量的速率差异,推导了信号功率谱密度(PSD)的解析封闭表达式,并从跟踪误差方差和多径误差包络两方面对跟踪结果进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信