Effective Beginning Handwriting Instruction: Multi-modal, Consistent Format for 2 Years, and Linked to Spelling and Composing.

Basal ganglia Pub Date : 2017-02-01 Epub Date: 2016-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4
Beverly Wolf, Robert D Abbott, Virginia W Berninger
{"title":"Effective Beginning Handwriting Instruction: Multi-modal, Consistent Format for 2 Years, and Linked to Spelling and Composing.","authors":"Beverly Wolf, Robert D Abbott, Virginia W Berninger","doi":"10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Study 1, the treatment group (<i>N</i> = 33 first graders, <i>M</i> = 6 years 10 months, 16 girls) received Slingerland multi-modal (auditory, visual, tactile, motor through hand, and motor through mouth) manuscript (unjoined) handwriting instruction embedded in systematic spelling, reading, and composing lessons; and the control group (<i>N</i> =16 first graders, <i>M</i> = 7 years 1 month, 7 girls) received manuscript handwriting instruction not systematically related to the other literacy activities. ANOVA showed both groups improved on automatic alphabet writing from memory; but ANCOVA with the automatic alphabet writing task as covariate showed that the treatment group improved significantly more than control group from the second to ninth month of first grade on dictated spelling and recognition of word-specific spellings among phonological foils. In Study 2 new groups received either a second year of manuscript (<i>N</i> = 29, <i>M</i> = 7 years 8 months, 16 girls) or introduction to cursive (joined) instruction in second grade (<i>N</i> = 24, <i>M</i> = 8 years 0 months, 11 girls) embedded in the Slingerland literacy program. ANCOVA with automatic alphabet writing as covariate showed that those who received a second year of manuscript handwriting instruction improved more on sustained handwriting over 30, 60, and 90 seconds than those who had had only one year of manuscript instruction; both groups improved in spelling and composing from the second to ninth month of second grade. Results are discussed in reference to mastering one handwriting format before introducing another format at a higher grade level and always embedding handwriting instruction in writing and reading instruction aimed at all levels of language.</p>","PeriodicalId":89327,"journal":{"name":"Basal ganglia","volume":"5 1","pages":"299-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basal ganglia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Study 1, the treatment group (N = 33 first graders, M = 6 years 10 months, 16 girls) received Slingerland multi-modal (auditory, visual, tactile, motor through hand, and motor through mouth) manuscript (unjoined) handwriting instruction embedded in systematic spelling, reading, and composing lessons; and the control group (N =16 first graders, M = 7 years 1 month, 7 girls) received manuscript handwriting instruction not systematically related to the other literacy activities. ANOVA showed both groups improved on automatic alphabet writing from memory; but ANCOVA with the automatic alphabet writing task as covariate showed that the treatment group improved significantly more than control group from the second to ninth month of first grade on dictated spelling and recognition of word-specific spellings among phonological foils. In Study 2 new groups received either a second year of manuscript (N = 29, M = 7 years 8 months, 16 girls) or introduction to cursive (joined) instruction in second grade (N = 24, M = 8 years 0 months, 11 girls) embedded in the Slingerland literacy program. ANCOVA with automatic alphabet writing as covariate showed that those who received a second year of manuscript handwriting instruction improved more on sustained handwriting over 30, 60, and 90 seconds than those who had had only one year of manuscript instruction; both groups improved in spelling and composing from the second to ninth month of second grade. Results are discussed in reference to mastering one handwriting format before introducing another format at a higher grade level and always embedding handwriting instruction in writing and reading instruction aimed at all levels of language.

有效的初级手写教学:多模式、两年形式一致,并与拼写和写作相关联。
在研究 1 中,治疗组(人数 = 33 名一年级学生,男 = 6 岁 10 个月,16 名女生)接受了 Slingerland 多模式(听觉、视觉、触觉、手部运动和口部运动)手稿(无连接)书写教学,并将其嵌入系统的拼写、阅读和作文课程中;对照组(人数 = 16 名一年级学生,男 = 7 岁 1 个月,7 名女生)接受了与其他读写活动无系统关联的手稿书写教学。方差分析显示,两组学生在根据记忆自动书写字母方面都有进步;但以自动字母书写任务为协变量的方差分析显示,从一年级的第二个月到第九个月,治疗组在听写拼写和在音素衬垫中识别特定单词拼写方面的进步明显高于对照组。在 "研究 2 "中,新的小组在二年级时接受了手抄本(29 人,男 = 7 岁 8 个月,16 个女孩)或草书入门(24 人,男 = 8 岁 0 个月,11 个女孩)教学,并将其嵌入了 Slingerland 识字课程中。以自动字母书写作为协变量的方差分析显示,接受第二年手稿书写教学的学生在 30 秒、60 秒和 90 秒的持续书写方面比只接受过一年手稿书写教学的学生进步更大;从二年级的第二个月到第九个月,两组学生在拼写和作文方面都有进步。在讨论这些结果时,参考了在更高年级引入另一种手写格式之前先掌握一种手写格式,以及始终将手写教学嵌入针对所有语言水平的写作和阅读教学中的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信