Comparison of efficacy and tolerance of low-volume preparations prior to colonoscopy a randomized trial.

{"title":"Comparison of efficacy and tolerance of low-volume preparations prior to colonoscopy a randomized trial.","authors":"","doi":"10.33699/pis.2019.98.7.277-281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of polyethylene glycol/ascorbic acid (PEGA), sodium picosulfate/ magnesium citrate (SPMC) and the oral sulfate formula (SIR) in a single- or split-dose regimen for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.\nMethods: Randomised, multicentre, open-label study. The subjects received either PEGA, SPMC or SIR in the single- or split-dose regimen before the colonoscopy. Quality and tolerability of the preparation and complaints during preparation were recorded using a 5 point scale.\nResults: 558 subject were analysed. Preparation quality was comparable in the single-dose regimen. The rate of satisfactory bowel cleansing (Aronchick score 1+2) was higher for split-dose SIR and PEGA compared to SPMC (95.6%, 86.2% vs. 72.5%, p<0.028). The highest tolerance rate (score 1+2) was reported for SPMC (82.3%, p<0.003) and the lowest for single-dose SIR (34.8%, p=0.008). The lowest frequency of nausea (10.4%) was observed for SPMC. The highest prevalence of bloating was linked with the use of PEGA (34.0%).\nConclusion: Differences in bowel preparation quality were apparent only in the split-dose regimen, with SIR rated as most efficient. SPMC was the best tolerated formula. The split-dose regimen is more effective than single-dose preparation used in the evening before the examination.","PeriodicalId":87201,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","volume":"248 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33699/pis.2019.98.7.277-281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of polyethylene glycol/ascorbic acid (PEGA), sodium picosulfate/ magnesium citrate (SPMC) and the oral sulfate formula (SIR) in a single- or split-dose regimen for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Methods: Randomised, multicentre, open-label study. The subjects received either PEGA, SPMC or SIR in the single- or split-dose regimen before the colonoscopy. Quality and tolerability of the preparation and complaints during preparation were recorded using a 5 point scale. Results: 558 subject were analysed. Preparation quality was comparable in the single-dose regimen. The rate of satisfactory bowel cleansing (Aronchick score 1+2) was higher for split-dose SIR and PEGA compared to SPMC (95.6%, 86.2% vs. 72.5%, p<0.028). The highest tolerance rate (score 1+2) was reported for SPMC (82.3%, p<0.003) and the lowest for single-dose SIR (34.8%, p=0.008). The lowest frequency of nausea (10.4%) was observed for SPMC. The highest prevalence of bloating was linked with the use of PEGA (34.0%). Conclusion: Differences in bowel preparation quality were apparent only in the split-dose regimen, with SIR rated as most efficient. SPMC was the best tolerated formula. The split-dose regimen is more effective than single-dose preparation used in the evening before the examination.
结肠镜检查前小容量制剂的疗效和耐受性的比较:一项随机试验。
简介:本研究的目的是比较聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸(PEGA)、皮硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁(SPMC)和口服硫酸配方(SIR)在结肠镜检查前的单剂量或分剂量肠道准备方案中的疗效和耐受性。方法:随机、多中心、开放标签研究。受试者在结肠镜检查前接受单剂量或分剂量的PEGA、SPMC或SIR治疗。使用5分制记录制剂的质量和耐受性以及制剂过程中的投诉。结果:共分析558例受试者。单剂量方案的制剂质量相当。分剂量SIR和PEGA的肠道清洁满意率(Aronchick评分1+2)高于SPMC(95.6%, 86.2%对72.5%,p<0.028)。SPMC耐药率最高(评分1+2)(82.3%,p<0.003),单剂量SIR耐药率最低(34.8%,p=0.008)。SPMC患者恶心发生率最低(10.4%)。腹胀的最高发生率与PEGA的使用有关(34.0%)。结论:肠准备质量的差异仅在分剂量方案中是明显的,SIR被评为最有效的。SPMC是耐受性最好的配方。分次给药方案比检查前晚上使用的单剂量制剂更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信