Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Gold (I) and (III) Ions and Gold Nanoparticles

TP Shareena Dasari, Y. Zhang, H. Yu
{"title":"Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Gold (I) and (III) Ions and Gold Nanoparticles","authors":"TP Shareena Dasari, Y. Zhang, H. Yu","doi":"10.4172/2167-0501.1000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and gold ion complexes have been investigated for their antibacterial activities. However, the majority of the reports failed to disclose the concentration of free Au(I) or Au(III) present in solutions of AuNPs or gold ion complexes. The inconsistency of antibacterial activity of AuNPs may be due to the effect of the presence of Au(III). Here we report the antibacterial activity of Au(I) and Au(III) to four different bacteria: one nonpathogenic bacterium: E. coli and three multidrug-resistant bacteria: E. coli, S. typhimurium DT104, and S. aureus. Au(I) and Au(III) as chloride are highly toxic to all the four bacteria, with IC50 of 0.35 – 0.49 µM for Au(III) and 0.27–0.52 µM for Au(I).The bacterial growth inhibition by both Au(I) and Au(III) increases with exposure time and is strongly affected by the use of buffers. The IC50 values for Au(I) and Au(III) in different buffers are HEPES (0.48 and 1.55 µM) > Trizma (0.41 and 0.57 µM) > PBS (0.14 and 0.06 µM). Bacterial growth inhibition by AuNPs is gradually reduced by centrifugation-resuspension to remove residual Au(III) ion present in the crude synthetic AuNPs. After 4 centrifugations-resuspensions, AuNPs become non-toxic. In addition, both Au(I) and Au(III) are cytotoxic to skin keratinocyte and blood lymphocyte cells. These results suggest that Au(I) and Au(III) in pure or complex forms may be explored as a method to treat drug-resistant bacteria, and the test of AuNPs toxicity must consider residual Au(III), exposure time, and the use of buffers.","PeriodicalId":8764,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0501.1000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and gold ion complexes have been investigated for their antibacterial activities. However, the majority of the reports failed to disclose the concentration of free Au(I) or Au(III) present in solutions of AuNPs or gold ion complexes. The inconsistency of antibacterial activity of AuNPs may be due to the effect of the presence of Au(III). Here we report the antibacterial activity of Au(I) and Au(III) to four different bacteria: one nonpathogenic bacterium: E. coli and three multidrug-resistant bacteria: E. coli, S. typhimurium DT104, and S. aureus. Au(I) and Au(III) as chloride are highly toxic to all the four bacteria, with IC50 of 0.35 – 0.49 µM for Au(III) and 0.27–0.52 µM for Au(I).The bacterial growth inhibition by both Au(I) and Au(III) increases with exposure time and is strongly affected by the use of buffers. The IC50 values for Au(I) and Au(III) in different buffers are HEPES (0.48 and 1.55 µM) > Trizma (0.41 and 0.57 µM) > PBS (0.14 and 0.06 µM). Bacterial growth inhibition by AuNPs is gradually reduced by centrifugation-resuspension to remove residual Au(III) ion present in the crude synthetic AuNPs. After 4 centrifugations-resuspensions, AuNPs become non-toxic. In addition, both Au(I) and Au(III) are cytotoxic to skin keratinocyte and blood lymphocyte cells. These results suggest that Au(I) and Au(III) in pure or complex forms may be explored as a method to treat drug-resistant bacteria, and the test of AuNPs toxicity must consider residual Au(III), exposure time, and the use of buffers.
金(I)和(III)离子及金纳米颗粒的抗菌活性和细胞毒性
研究了金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)和金离子配合物的抗菌活性。然而,大多数报告未能披露AuNPs或金离子配合物溶液中游离Au(I)或Au(III)的浓度。AuNPs抗菌活性的不一致性可能是由于Au(III)存在的影响。在这里,我们报告了Au(I)和Au(III)对四种不同细菌的抗菌活性:一种非致病性细菌:大肠杆菌和三种多重耐药细菌:大肠杆菌、鼠伤寒沙门氏菌DT104和金黄色葡萄球菌。Au(I)和Au(III)作为氯化物对四种细菌均具有高毒性,Au(III)的IC50为0.35 ~ 0.49µM, Au(I)的IC50为0.27 ~ 0.52µM。金(I)和金(III)对细菌生长的抑制作用随着暴露时间的增加而增加,并受到缓冲液使用的强烈影响。Au(I)和Au(III)在不同缓冲液中的IC50值依次为HEPES(0.48和1.55µM) > Trizma(0.41和0.57µM) > PBS(0.14和0.06µM)。通过离心重悬浮去除粗合成AuNPs中残留的Au(III)离子,可以逐渐降低AuNPs对细菌生长的抑制作用。经过4次离心重悬后,AuNPs无毒。此外,金(I)和金(III)对皮肤角质细胞和血液淋巴细胞都有细胞毒性。这些结果表明,纯形式或复合形式的Au(I)和Au(III)可以作为治疗耐药细菌的方法,并且AuNPs毒性测试必须考虑Au(III)残留量、暴露时间和缓冲液的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信