Fluoride release and recharge of enhanced resin modified glass ionomer at different time intervals

Shaymaa M. Nagi , Lamiaa M. Moharam , Ahmed Z. El Hoshy
{"title":"Fluoride release and recharge of enhanced resin modified glass ionomer at different time intervals","authors":"Shaymaa M. Nagi ,&nbsp;Lamiaa M. Moharam ,&nbsp;Ahmed Z. El Hoshy","doi":"10.1016/j.fdj.2018.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate the fluoride release and recharge from two fluoride releasing materials at different time intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Sixty specimens were prepared then equally divided into 12 groups (n = 5/group), representing materials used; one resin modified glass ionomer restoration (RMGI); Fuji II LC and one enhanced RMGI; ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Each material was evaluated for its fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge using a topical fluoride recharging gel at 1, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistical significant difference between different tested time intervals regarding fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge for both tested materials, where (p ≤ 0.001). The highest mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-1), and the least mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-28). There was no statistical significant difference between both materials at each time interval regarding fluoride release before recharge. While after fluoride recharge; RMGI (Fuji II LC) showed higher fluoride release mean values compared to the enhanced RMGI (ACTIVA) at each time interval (1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 days).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RMGI and enhanced RMGI, showed the same pattern of fluoride release in deionized water, but RMGI was more successful to be recharged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 221-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.06.005","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314718018300454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the fluoride release and recharge from two fluoride releasing materials at different time intervals.

Materials and methods

Sixty specimens were prepared then equally divided into 12 groups (n = 5/group), representing materials used; one resin modified glass ionomer restoration (RMGI); Fuji II LC and one enhanced RMGI; ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Each material was evaluated for its fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge using a topical fluoride recharging gel at 1, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days.

Results

There was a statistical significant difference between different tested time intervals regarding fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge for both tested materials, where (p ≤ 0.001). The highest mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-1), and the least mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-28). There was no statistical significant difference between both materials at each time interval regarding fluoride release before recharge. While after fluoride recharge; RMGI (Fuji II LC) showed higher fluoride release mean values compared to the enhanced RMGI (ACTIVA) at each time interval (1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 days).

Conclusion

RMGI and enhanced RMGI, showed the same pattern of fluoride release in deionized water, but RMGI was more successful to be recharged.

增强树脂改性玻璃离聚体在不同时间间隔下的氟化物释放与回灌
目的研究两种氟释放材料在不同时间间隔下的氟释放和补给情况。材料和方法制备60个标本,平均分为12组(n = 5/组),代表使用的材料;一种树脂改性玻璃离子修复(RMGI);富士II LC和一个增强型RMGI;ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative。在第1、2、7、14、21和28天,使用局部补氟凝胶评估每种材料在补氟前后的氟化物释放情况。结果两种材料在充氟前后不同时间间隔的氟释放量差异有统计学意义(p≤0.001)。氟释放的平均值在第(1)天最高,第(28)天最低。在各时间间隔内,两种材料在充注前的氟化物释放量无统计学差异。而氟化物补给后;在每个时间间隔(1、2、7、14、21、28天),RMGI (Fuji II LC)的氟释放平均值均高于增强RMGI (ACTIVA)。结论RMGI与增强型RMGI在去离子水中释放氟的模式相同,但RMGI的再充电更成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信