Paradigm Shift in Drilling to Completion in Unconventional Reservoir, Eastern Onshore, India

Reddy B. S., Ramana Rao U. V, S. T, Ramakrishna C H, Ramya Sri A. R, A. Bandyopadhyay, Raj Kumar, J. Zacharia, Vibhu Kumar
{"title":"Paradigm Shift in Drilling to Completion in Unconventional Reservoir, Eastern Onshore, India","authors":"Reddy B. S., Ramana Rao U. V, S. T, Ramakrishna C H, Ramya Sri A. R, A. Bandyopadhyay, Raj Kumar, J. Zacharia, Vibhu Kumar","doi":"10.2118/204625-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Permo-Triassic formations in Mandapetta field from eastern onshore, India possesses historical drilling challenges in terms of wellbore instability, non-productive time and poor hole condition in deep higher stressed formations. Lack of acquiring reliable log data and problems in recovering good quality cores present difficulties in proper formation evaluation and zone selection for testing. Historical well test results in target K-Formation has been not encouraging despite good gas shows during drilling. Estimated formation pressure gradient ranges 1.45sg-1.52sg. Layered shale with coal and tight sandstone in same open hole section pose risks of mud losses and poor cement job. Present study highlights the workflow adopted to improve drilling and completion in open hole section of more than 1000 m with varying lithology being drilled successfully. Advanced 3D anisotropic acoustic measurements acquired are used to estimate anisotropic elastic properties (vertical and horizontal Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio) in the overlying shales. Horizontal tectonics has been determined across stress induced anisotropic layers. This approach provides better understanding of formations and stress distribution. Thomsen Gamma values range 0.1 to 0.4 in shale layers of overburden formations. In order to minimize uncertainty in 8.5inch section while drilling, advanced logs were acquired in 12.25inch hole section to estimate tectonics at well location while constraining ratio of horizontal to vertical Young's modulus and Poisson Ratio in shale layers based on Thomsen Gamma and clay volume. Analysis suggested typical VTI anisotropy of 15%-20% in shale layers. Inverted direct horizontal strain parameters at well location suggested the ratio of maximum to minimum horizontal stress to vary 1.15-1.23. Mud weight used while drilling 8.5inch section ranged 1.49sg1.52sg against the recommended mud weight of 1.50sg-1.52sg while pumping sealing agents to prevent mud losses in coal layers. Flow rate was maintained on lower values to minimize ECD values. Hole condition improved significantly with no issues in logging. Post-drill anisotropic rock mechanics model suggested good quality sandstone in target source formation with usual conventional reservoir in shallower formation. Zone was selected based on permeability, breakdown and completion quality for perforations. Analysis of high-quality sonic slowness helped to identify possible gas reservoir in laminated source rock. There was stress contrast of 2000psi-2500psi among reservoir layers and shale stress barriers. Implemented workflow and successful execution helped to drill the well 5 days earlier than plan with no major drilling incidents. Successful core recovery for Shale Gas evaluation was also possible due to better wellbore quality. Initial testing of K-Formation produced gas with significant improved flow rate by 150% without any stimulation for the 1st time in the history of the field.","PeriodicalId":11320,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204625-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permo-Triassic formations in Mandapetta field from eastern onshore, India possesses historical drilling challenges in terms of wellbore instability, non-productive time and poor hole condition in deep higher stressed formations. Lack of acquiring reliable log data and problems in recovering good quality cores present difficulties in proper formation evaluation and zone selection for testing. Historical well test results in target K-Formation has been not encouraging despite good gas shows during drilling. Estimated formation pressure gradient ranges 1.45sg-1.52sg. Layered shale with coal and tight sandstone in same open hole section pose risks of mud losses and poor cement job. Present study highlights the workflow adopted to improve drilling and completion in open hole section of more than 1000 m with varying lithology being drilled successfully. Advanced 3D anisotropic acoustic measurements acquired are used to estimate anisotropic elastic properties (vertical and horizontal Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio) in the overlying shales. Horizontal tectonics has been determined across stress induced anisotropic layers. This approach provides better understanding of formations and stress distribution. Thomsen Gamma values range 0.1 to 0.4 in shale layers of overburden formations. In order to minimize uncertainty in 8.5inch section while drilling, advanced logs were acquired in 12.25inch hole section to estimate tectonics at well location while constraining ratio of horizontal to vertical Young's modulus and Poisson Ratio in shale layers based on Thomsen Gamma and clay volume. Analysis suggested typical VTI anisotropy of 15%-20% in shale layers. Inverted direct horizontal strain parameters at well location suggested the ratio of maximum to minimum horizontal stress to vary 1.15-1.23. Mud weight used while drilling 8.5inch section ranged 1.49sg1.52sg against the recommended mud weight of 1.50sg-1.52sg while pumping sealing agents to prevent mud losses in coal layers. Flow rate was maintained on lower values to minimize ECD values. Hole condition improved significantly with no issues in logging. Post-drill anisotropic rock mechanics model suggested good quality sandstone in target source formation with usual conventional reservoir in shallower formation. Zone was selected based on permeability, breakdown and completion quality for perforations. Analysis of high-quality sonic slowness helped to identify possible gas reservoir in laminated source rock. There was stress contrast of 2000psi-2500psi among reservoir layers and shale stress barriers. Implemented workflow and successful execution helped to drill the well 5 days earlier than plan with no major drilling incidents. Successful core recovery for Shale Gas evaluation was also possible due to better wellbore quality. Initial testing of K-Formation produced gas with significant improved flow rate by 150% without any stimulation for the 1st time in the history of the field.
印度东部陆上非常规油藏钻井到完井模式转变
印度东部Mandapetta油田的二叠纪-三叠纪地层在深部高应力地层中存在井筒不稳定性、非生产时间和井况差等历史难题。由于缺乏可靠的测井资料和难以获得高质量岩心,给地层评价和储层选择带来了困难。尽管在钻探过程中发现了良好的天然气,但目标K-Formation的历史试井结果并不令人鼓舞。估计地层压力梯度范围为1.45sg-1.52sg。在同一裸眼井段,煤和致密砂岩层状页岩存在泥浆漏失和固井效果差的风险。本研究重点介绍了在1000米以上不同岩性裸眼井段成功钻井和完井所采用的工作流程。利用先进的三维各向异性声学测量数据来估计上覆页岩的各向异性弹性特性(垂直和水平杨氏模量和泊松比)。在应力诱导的各向异性层上确定了水平构造。这种方法可以更好地理解地层和应力分布。在页岩覆盖层中,Thomsen Gamma值为0.1 ~ 0.4。为了最大限度地减少8.5英寸井段的钻井不确定性,在12.25英寸井段采集了先进的测井资料,以估计井位构造,同时根据Thomsen Gamma和粘土体积约束页岩层的水平与垂直杨氏模量和泊松比。分析表明,页岩层典型的VTI各向异性为15% ~ 20%。倒置的井位直接水平应变参数表明,最大与最小水平应力之比为1.15 ~ 1.23。钻井8.5英寸段时使用的泥浆比重为1.49sg -1.52sg,而推荐的泥浆比重为1.50sg-1.52sg,同时泵送密封剂以防止煤层泥浆流失。流速保持在较低的值,以最小化ECD值。井眼状况明显改善,测井无问题。钻后各向异性岩石力学模型表明,浅层常规储层为常规储层,目标源层砂岩质量较好。根据射孔的渗透率、击穿和完井质量选择层位。高质量声波慢度分析有助于识别层状烃源岩中可能存在的气藏。储层与页岩应力屏障之间存在2000psi ~ 2500psi的应力对比。实施的工作流程和成功的执行使钻井比计划提前了5天,没有发生重大钻井事故。由于井眼质量更好,页岩气评价的岩心采收率也得以成功实现。在没有任何增产措施的情况下,k -地层的初始测试使产气量显著提高了150%,这是该油田历史上的第一次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信