The importance of mooring line model fidelity in floating wind turbine simulations

M. Hall, B. Buckham, C. Crawford, R. Nicoll
{"title":"The importance of mooring line model fidelity in floating wind turbine simulations","authors":"M. Hall, B. Buckham, C. Crawford, R. Nicoll","doi":"10.23919/OCEANS.2011.6107138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate computer modelling is critical in achieving cost effective floating offshore wind turbine designs. In floating wind turbine simulation codes, mooring line models often employ a quasi-static approximation that neglects mooring line inertia and hydrodynamics. The loss of accuracy from using this approach has not been thoroughly quantified. To test whether this widely-used simplified mooring line modelling approach is adequate, the open-source floating wind turbine simulator FAST was modified to allow the use of an alternative, fully dynamic, mooring model based on the hydrodynamics simulator ProteusDS. The OC3-Hywind floating wind turbine design was implemented in this newly-coupled simulator arrangement and tested using a variety of regular wave conditions. The static equivalence between the built-in quasi-static mooring model and the newly-coupled dynamic mooring model is very good. Tests using both models were performed looking at scenarios of the response of the system in still water and the response to regular waves and steady winds. The dynamic mooring model significantly increased the overall platform damping in translational DOFs during motion decay tests in still water. There was very little difference between the models in coupled tests where regular wave excitation was the primary driver of platform motions, except for the addition of small levels of power in the higher frequencies of the platform motion spectrum. The nature of the different tests suggests that it is only in situations where the platform motions and wave velocities are not synchronized that the damping from the dynamic mooring model makes a large difference. This points to irregular wave conditions as providing a better test of the differences between mooring models.","PeriodicalId":19442,"journal":{"name":"OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA","volume":"49 2 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2011.6107138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Accurate computer modelling is critical in achieving cost effective floating offshore wind turbine designs. In floating wind turbine simulation codes, mooring line models often employ a quasi-static approximation that neglects mooring line inertia and hydrodynamics. The loss of accuracy from using this approach has not been thoroughly quantified. To test whether this widely-used simplified mooring line modelling approach is adequate, the open-source floating wind turbine simulator FAST was modified to allow the use of an alternative, fully dynamic, mooring model based on the hydrodynamics simulator ProteusDS. The OC3-Hywind floating wind turbine design was implemented in this newly-coupled simulator arrangement and tested using a variety of regular wave conditions. The static equivalence between the built-in quasi-static mooring model and the newly-coupled dynamic mooring model is very good. Tests using both models were performed looking at scenarios of the response of the system in still water and the response to regular waves and steady winds. The dynamic mooring model significantly increased the overall platform damping in translational DOFs during motion decay tests in still water. There was very little difference between the models in coupled tests where regular wave excitation was the primary driver of platform motions, except for the addition of small levels of power in the higher frequencies of the platform motion spectrum. The nature of the different tests suggests that it is only in situations where the platform motions and wave velocities are not synchronized that the damping from the dynamic mooring model makes a large difference. This points to irregular wave conditions as providing a better test of the differences between mooring models.
系泊线模型保真度在浮式风力机仿真中的重要性
精确的计算机建模对于实现具有成本效益的浮动海上风力涡轮机设计至关重要。在浮式风力机仿真代码中,系泊线模型通常采用准静态近似,忽略了系泊线惯性和水动力。使用这种方法所造成的准确性损失尚未得到彻底的量化。为了测试这种广泛使用的简化系泊线建模方法是否足够,对开源浮动式风力涡轮机模拟器FAST进行了修改,以允许使用基于流体动力学模拟器ProteusDS的替代全动态系泊模型。OC3-Hywind浮式风力涡轮机设计在这种新的耦合模拟器布置中实现,并在各种规则波浪条件下进行了测试。内建的准静态系泊模型与新耦合的动态系泊模型具有很好的静力等效性。使用这两种模型进行了测试,以观察系统在静水中的响应情况以及对正常波浪和稳定风的响应情况。在静水中运动衰减试验中,动态系泊模型显著增加了平台平动自由度的整体阻尼。除了在平台运动频谱的较高频率中添加少量功率外,耦合试验中规则波激励是平台运动的主要驱动因素的模型之间差异很小。不同测试的性质表明,只有在平台运动和波速不同步的情况下,动力系泊模型的阻尼才会产生很大的差异。这表明不规则波浪条件可以更好地测试系泊模型之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信