Comparison of Success Rate of Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Using Burn’s Wean Assessment Program and Routine Method

Aliakbar Keykha, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, M. Khoshfetrat
{"title":"Comparison of Success Rate of Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Using Burn’s Wean Assessment Program and Routine Method","authors":"Aliakbar Keykha, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, M. Khoshfetrat","doi":"10.5812/CCN.12557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Weaning decision for the patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) is often made based on personal judgments and experiences, which results in longer MV length of stay and higher costs. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Burn’s wean assessment program on the success rate of weaning from ventilator in patients admitted to the Intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: The present experimental study was carried out on 100 patients undergoing MV for more than 72 hours. The patients were selected by convenience sampling and randomly divided into two groups of 50 subjects. Burn’s wean assessment program was applied to the intervention group, while weaning was assessed by a physician in the control group. Results: 35 patients in the intervention group were male and 15 were female. In the control group, 36 were male and 14 were female. Chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.826). In the intervention group, 46 patients had successful weaning (92%) and 4 patients had unsuccessful weaning (8%). In the control group, 35 patients had successful weaning (70%) and 15 patients had unsuccessful weaning (30%). Chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Using Burn’s scale for assessing patient readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation is more useful.","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/CCN.12557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Weaning decision for the patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) is often made based on personal judgments and experiences, which results in longer MV length of stay and higher costs. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Burn’s wean assessment program on the success rate of weaning from ventilator in patients admitted to the Intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: The present experimental study was carried out on 100 patients undergoing MV for more than 72 hours. The patients were selected by convenience sampling and randomly divided into two groups of 50 subjects. Burn’s wean assessment program was applied to the intervention group, while weaning was assessed by a physician in the control group. Results: 35 patients in the intervention group were male and 15 were female. In the control group, 36 were male and 14 were female. Chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.826). In the intervention group, 46 patients had successful weaning (92%) and 4 patients had unsuccessful weaning (8%). In the control group, 35 patients had successful weaning (70%) and 15 patients had unsuccessful weaning (30%). Chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Using Burn’s scale for assessing patient readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation is more useful.
烧伤断奶评估方案与常规方法对机械通气断奶成功率的比较
背景与目的:机械通气患者的脱机决策往往基于个人判断和经验,导致机械通气住院时间较长,费用较高。因此,本研究旨在评估Burn的断奶评估程序对重症监护病房(ICU)患者脱离呼吸机成功率的影响。方法:本实验研究对100例MV患者进行了72小时以上的实验研究。采用方便抽样法将患者随机分为两组,每组50人。干预组采用Burn的断奶评估程序,对照组由医生评估断奶。结果:干预组男性35例,女性15例。对照组男性36例,女性14例。卡方检验显示两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.826)。干预组46例(92%)成功断奶,4例(8%)不成功断奶。对照组断奶成功35例(70%),不成功15例(30%)。卡方检验显示两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.005)。结论:使用烧伤量表评估患者脱离机械通气的准备情况更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信