Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder: impact of learning curve and long-term assessment of functional outcomes.

Q1 Medicine
G. Tuderti, R. Mastroianni, A. Brassetti, A. Bove, L. Misuraca, U. Anceschi, M. Ferriero, M. Gallucci, G. Simone
{"title":"Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder: impact of learning curve and long-term assessment of functional outcomes.","authors":"G. Tuderti, R. Mastroianni, A. Brassetti, A. Bove, L. Misuraca, U. Anceschi, M. Ferriero, M. Gallucci, G. Simone","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03948-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is paucity of data about functional outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orhotopic neobladder (ICON), and the impact of learning curve (LC) on those outcomes remains to be addressed. We aimed to report long-term functional outcomes of our single center series of RARC with ICON, assessing the role of LC in their achievement.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients treated with Robot assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder in our center between January 2012 an August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Preoperative, clinical, perioperative, pathologic and functional data were reported. The first cases were divided in tertiles, for assessing the impact of learning curve on the outcomes evaluated. Long-term functional outcomes of the whole cohort were evaluated.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 167 patients were included. Concerning tertiles analysis, operative time (p<0.001), incidence of low (p=0.002) and high grade (p=0.001) complications and hospital stay (p=0.04) decreased significantly over time. Day-time continence recovery probability was significantly lower in the initial case series (1-yr rate 68.4%, 87% and 89.8 for I, II and III tertile, respectively; p=0.04;). Accordingly, Trifecta achievement was significantly higher in II and III tertiles (p=0.01). At a median follow- up of 34 months, the incidence of significant renal function deterioration of the whole cohort was 16.7%. Overall, 12, 24 and 60-mo day-time continence rates were 74.8 %, 82.7 % and 82.7 %.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPatients treated at the beginning of the learning curve show worse perioperative and functional results. Once standardized the procedure, complications rates, hospital stay and daytime continence recovery experienced a significant improvement. At a long-term analysis of functional outcomes of our patients, renal function preservation and continence recovery results are encouraging.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03948-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is paucity of data about functional outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orhotopic neobladder (ICON), and the impact of learning curve (LC) on those outcomes remains to be addressed. We aimed to report long-term functional outcomes of our single center series of RARC with ICON, assessing the role of LC in their achievement. METHODS Patients treated with Robot assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder in our center between January 2012 an August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Preoperative, clinical, perioperative, pathologic and functional data were reported. The first cases were divided in tertiles, for assessing the impact of learning curve on the outcomes evaluated. Long-term functional outcomes of the whole cohort were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 167 patients were included. Concerning tertiles analysis, operative time (p<0.001), incidence of low (p=0.002) and high grade (p=0.001) complications and hospital stay (p=0.04) decreased significantly over time. Day-time continence recovery probability was significantly lower in the initial case series (1-yr rate 68.4%, 87% and 89.8 for I, II and III tertile, respectively; p=0.04;). Accordingly, Trifecta achievement was significantly higher in II and III tertiles (p=0.01). At a median follow- up of 34 months, the incidence of significant renal function deterioration of the whole cohort was 16.7%. Overall, 12, 24 and 60-mo day-time continence rates were 74.8 %, 82.7 % and 82.7 %. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated at the beginning of the learning curve show worse perioperative and functional results. Once standardized the procedure, complications rates, hospital stay and daytime continence recovery experienced a significant improvement. At a long-term analysis of functional outcomes of our patients, renal function preservation and continence recovery results are encouraging.
机器人辅助的体外新膀胱根治性膀胱切除术:学习曲线的影响和功能结果的长期评估。
关于机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)与体内原位新膀胱(ICON)的功能结果的数据缺乏,学习曲线(LC)对这些结果的影响仍有待解决。我们的目的是报告我们的单中心RARC系列与ICON的长期功能结果,评估LC在其实现中的作用。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2019年8月在我中心行机器人辅助原位膀胱根治术的患者。报告术前、临床、围手术期、病理及功能资料。第一批病例被分成几组,以评估学习曲线对评估结果的影响。对整个队列的长期功能结果进行评估。结果共纳入167例患者。在分位数分析中,手术时间(p<0.001)、低(p=0.002)和高(p=0.001)并发症发生率以及住院时间(p=0.04)均随时间显著减少。在初始病例系列中,日间失禁恢复概率显著降低(I、II和III胎的1年率分别为68.4%、87%和89.8;p = 0.04)。因此,三叶草在II和III分位的成活率显著高于其他分位(p=0.01)。在中位随访34个月时,整个队列中显著肾功能恶化的发生率为16.7%。总体而言,12个月、24个月和60个月的日间尿失禁率分别为74.8%、82.7%和82.7%。结论在学习曲线开始时治疗的患者围手术期和功能效果较差。一旦程序标准化,并发症发生率、住院时间和日间失禁恢复经历了显著改善。在对患者功能结果的长期分析中,肾功能保存和失禁恢复的结果令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信