A comparative review of three farm management support organisations in the South Pacific

Clare Bishop
{"title":"A comparative review of three farm management support organisations in the South Pacific","authors":"Clare Bishop","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90057-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper compares three approaches which have been used for providing farm management advice to co-operatives and farming groups in the Solomon Islands, Fiji and Vanuatu. Whilst each support organisation pursues similar objectives in terms of facilitating agricultural development and promoting human resource development, different priorities have been attached to realising them.</p><p>As a result there are operational differences between the three. These variations have resulted in structures and styles which have proved effective for meeting the immediate tasks facing each organisation. With regard to longer-term contributions, and particularly human resource development, three conditions are identified which could enable support organisations to realise their potential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90057-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0269747588900578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper compares three approaches which have been used for providing farm management advice to co-operatives and farming groups in the Solomon Islands, Fiji and Vanuatu. Whilst each support organisation pursues similar objectives in terms of facilitating agricultural development and promoting human resource development, different priorities have been attached to realising them.

As a result there are operational differences between the three. These variations have resulted in structures and styles which have proved effective for meeting the immediate tasks facing each organisation. With regard to longer-term contributions, and particularly human resource development, three conditions are identified which could enable support organisations to realise their potential.

对南太平洋三个农场管理支助组织的比较审查
本文比较了在所罗门群岛、斐济和瓦努阿图为合作社和农业团体提供农场管理建议所采用的三种方法。虽然每个支助组织在促进农业发展和促进人力资源开发方面追求类似的目标,但实现这些目标的优先次序不同。因此,这三者之间存在操作上的差异。这些变化导致的结构和风格已被证明对满足每个组织面临的直接任务是有效的。关于长期贡献,特别是人力资源开发,确定了三个条件,可以使支持组织实现其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信