Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

J. Unick, S. Gaussoin, J. Bahnson, R. Crow, J. Curtis, T. Killean, J. Regensteiner, K. Stewart, R. Wing, J. Jakicic
{"title":"Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"J. Unick, S. Gaussoin, J. Bahnson, R. Crow, J. Curtis, T. Killean, J. Regensteiner, K. Stewart, R. Wing, J. Jakicic","doi":"10.17352/2455-5487.000002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo examine whether a subjective measure of moderate-intensity exercise (12-13 on Borg's ratings of perceived exertion scale; RPE) corresponds to the target heart rate for moderate-intensity exercise (40-59% heart rate reserve; %HRR) and to determine the characteristics of those for whom RPE does not appropriately estimate exercise intensity.\n\n\nMETHODS\n3582 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age: 58.3±6.8 years; BMI: 35.9±5.9 kg/m2) underwent a maximal exercise test and minute-by-minute HR and RPE were recorded. Linear regression was used to determine the %HRR corresponding to an RPE of 12 and 13 for each individual.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAt an RPE of 12 or 13, 57% of participants fell within the target 40-59%HRR range, while 37% and 6% fell above and below this range, respectively. Participants with a %HRR ≥60% (above range) were more likely to be female (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.01,1.40), African American (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.35, 2.02) or Hispanic (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.95), have a higher BMI (OR: 1.03; 95% CI 1.01, 1.04) and HRmax (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.02), and lower fitness (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.94) and RPEmax (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.73), compared to those within the target 40-59%HRR range (p-values'<0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nRPE appropriately gauges exercise intensity in approximately half of overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes; however, more than one-third of participants were at an increased risk of exercising at a higher than prescribed intensity when using RPE. Future studies should continue to examine the characteristics of individuals for whom RPE appropriately estimates exercise intensity and for those whom it does not.","PeriodicalId":90608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of novel physiotherapy and physical rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of novel physiotherapy and physical rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5487.000002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

PURPOSE To examine whether a subjective measure of moderate-intensity exercise (12-13 on Borg's ratings of perceived exertion scale; RPE) corresponds to the target heart rate for moderate-intensity exercise (40-59% heart rate reserve; %HRR) and to determine the characteristics of those for whom RPE does not appropriately estimate exercise intensity. METHODS 3582 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age: 58.3±6.8 years; BMI: 35.9±5.9 kg/m2) underwent a maximal exercise test and minute-by-minute HR and RPE were recorded. Linear regression was used to determine the %HRR corresponding to an RPE of 12 and 13 for each individual. RESULTS At an RPE of 12 or 13, 57% of participants fell within the target 40-59%HRR range, while 37% and 6% fell above and below this range, respectively. Participants with a %HRR ≥60% (above range) were more likely to be female (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.01,1.40), African American (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.35, 2.02) or Hispanic (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.95), have a higher BMI (OR: 1.03; 95% CI 1.01, 1.04) and HRmax (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.02), and lower fitness (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.94) and RPEmax (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.73), compared to those within the target 40-59%HRR range (p-values'<0.05). CONCLUSIONS RPE appropriately gauges exercise intensity in approximately half of overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes; however, more than one-third of participants were at an increased risk of exercising at a higher than prescribed intensity when using RPE. Future studies should continue to examine the characteristics of individuals for whom RPE appropriately estimates exercise intensity and for those whom it does not.
2型糖尿病患者感知运动评分的有效性。
目的:探讨中等强度运动的主观测量(Borg’s知觉运动量表12-13分)是否有效;RPE)对应于中等强度运动的目标心率(40-59%的心率储备;%HRR),并确定那些RPE不能正确估计运动强度的人的特征。方法3582例2型糖尿病患者(年龄:58.3±6.8岁;BMI: 35.9±5.9 kg/m2)进行最大运动试验,记录分分钟HR和RPE。线性回归用于确定每个个体对应于RPE为12和13的%HRR。结果当RPE为12或13时,57%的参与者hrr落在目标40-59%范围内,37%和6%的参与者hrr落在目标40-59%范围以上和以下。%HRR≥60%(以上范围)的参与者更有可能是女性(OR: 1.19;95% CI: 1.01,1.40),非裔美国人(OR: 1.65;95% CI: 1.35, 2.02)或西班牙裔(or: 1.57;95% CI: 1.27, 1.95), BMI较高(OR: 1.03;95% CI 1.01, 1.04)和HRmax (OR: 1.02;95% CI: 1.01, 1.02),适应度较低(OR: 0.90;95% CI: 0.85, 0.94)和RPEmax (OR: 0.68;95% CI: 0.63, 0.73),与目标hrr范围为40-59%的患者相比(p值<0.05)。结论:srpe对大约一半的超重2型糖尿病患者的运动强度进行了适当的测量;然而,超过三分之一的参与者在使用RPE时,以高于规定强度的运动风险增加。未来的研究应该继续检查RPE适当估计运动强度和不适当估计运动强度的个体的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信