{"title":"MetaCrowd: Crowdsourcing Biomedical Metadata Quality Assessment","authors":"A. Zaveri, Wei Hu, M. Dumontier","doi":"10.15346/hc.v6i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reuse the enormous amounts of biomedical data available on the Web, there is an urgent need for good quality metadata. This is extremely important to ensure that data is maximally Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) allow users to specify metadata in the form of textual key: value pairs (e.g. sex: female). However, since there is no structured vocabulary or format available, the 44,000,000+ key: value pairs suffer from numerous quality issues. Using domain experts for the curation is not only time consuming but also unscalable. Thus, in our approach, MetaCrowd, we apply crowdsourcing as a means for GEO metadata quality assessment. Our results show crowdsourcing is a reliable and feasible way to identify similar as well as erroneous metadata in GEO. This is extremely useful for data consumers and producers for curating and providing good quality metadata.","PeriodicalId":92785,"journal":{"name":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","volume":"49 1","pages":"98-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v6i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
To reuse the enormous amounts of biomedical data available on the Web, there is an urgent need for good quality metadata. This is extremely important to ensure that data is maximally Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) allow users to specify metadata in the form of textual key: value pairs (e.g. sex: female). However, since there is no structured vocabulary or format available, the 44,000,000+ key: value pairs suffer from numerous quality issues. Using domain experts for the curation is not only time consuming but also unscalable. Thus, in our approach, MetaCrowd, we apply crowdsourcing as a means for GEO metadata quality assessment. Our results show crowdsourcing is a reliable and feasible way to identify similar as well as erroneous metadata in GEO. This is extremely useful for data consumers and producers for curating and providing good quality metadata.
为了重用Web上可用的大量生物医学数据,迫切需要高质量的元数据。这对于确保数据最大限度地可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用是极其重要的。Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)允许用户以文本键:值对的形式指定元数据(例如,性别:女性)。然而,由于没有结构化词汇表或格式可用,44,000,000多个键:值对遭受了许多质量问题。使用领域专家进行管理不仅耗时而且不可扩展。因此,在我们的方法MetaCrowd中,我们将众包作为GEO元数据质量评估的一种手段。我们的研究结果表明,众包是一种可靠可行的方法来识别GEO中相似和错误的元数据。这对于数据消费者和生产者管理和提供高质量的元数据非常有用。