Notes on Recent Work in Descriptive Bibliography

G. T. Tanselle
{"title":"Notes on Recent Work in Descriptive Bibliography","authors":"G. T. Tanselle","doi":"10.1353/SIB.2018.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During a forty-year period, from 1966 through 2006, I published a series of essays covering every aspect of descriptive bibliography. Taken together, these essays form a comprehensive treatise on the subject. Although this consolidated work signifi cantly revises Fredson Bowers’s Principles of Bibliographical Description (1949) and stands on its own, I regard it not simply as a replacement for the Principles but as a companion piece to that book. After all, a classic can never be entirely superseded, and the Principles will always be worth reading for many specifi c passages and for the attitude it displays: every detail is a refl ection of the view that descriptive bibliography is a form of historical scholarship. No one can come away from the book without understanding that descriptive bibliography is not just a guide to the identifi cation of fi rst editions (though it serves that purpose) but is rather a history of the production and publication of the books taken up and thus a contribution to the broader annals of printing and publishing. Nevertheless, any work from as long ago as 1949 is likely to require some adjustments, and my essays provide a rethinking and redefi nition of some basic concepts, particularly ideal copy, issue, state, and format. I have also proposed a simpler and more logical system for noting inserted leaves in collation formulas and have offered more detailed suggestions for describing paper, type, non-letterpress material, and publishers’ bindings. Two matters barely commented on by Bowers are given extensive discussion in two of my essays: the incorporation of the results of bibliographical analysis (that is, analysis of typesetting and presswork) into a descriptive bibliography, and the considerations involved in the overall organization of a bibliography (along with the numbering of its entries and the recording of copies examined). I have tried throughout to express, more fully than he did, the rationale lying behind the inclusion of every element in a description and the manner of presenting such features. (My detailed criticisms of certain proposals, both by him and by others, are meant to illustrate these rationales in practice.)","PeriodicalId":82836,"journal":{"name":"Studies in bibliography","volume":"448 1","pages":"1 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in bibliography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SIB.2018.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During a forty-year period, from 1966 through 2006, I published a series of essays covering every aspect of descriptive bibliography. Taken together, these essays form a comprehensive treatise on the subject. Although this consolidated work signifi cantly revises Fredson Bowers’s Principles of Bibliographical Description (1949) and stands on its own, I regard it not simply as a replacement for the Principles but as a companion piece to that book. After all, a classic can never be entirely superseded, and the Principles will always be worth reading for many specifi c passages and for the attitude it displays: every detail is a refl ection of the view that descriptive bibliography is a form of historical scholarship. No one can come away from the book without understanding that descriptive bibliography is not just a guide to the identifi cation of fi rst editions (though it serves that purpose) but is rather a history of the production and publication of the books taken up and thus a contribution to the broader annals of printing and publishing. Nevertheless, any work from as long ago as 1949 is likely to require some adjustments, and my essays provide a rethinking and redefi nition of some basic concepts, particularly ideal copy, issue, state, and format. I have also proposed a simpler and more logical system for noting inserted leaves in collation formulas and have offered more detailed suggestions for describing paper, type, non-letterpress material, and publishers’ bindings. Two matters barely commented on by Bowers are given extensive discussion in two of my essays: the incorporation of the results of bibliographical analysis (that is, analysis of typesetting and presswork) into a descriptive bibliography, and the considerations involved in the overall organization of a bibliography (along with the numbering of its entries and the recording of copies examined). I have tried throughout to express, more fully than he did, the rationale lying behind the inclusion of every element in a description and the manner of presenting such features. (My detailed criticisms of certain proposals, both by him and by others, are meant to illustrate these rationales in practice.)
关于描述性目录学最近工作的说明
从1966年到2006年的40年间,我发表了一系列文章,涵盖了描述性参考书目的各个方面。这些文章合在一起就构成了一篇关于这个主题的综合论述。虽然这本综合著作对弗赖森·鲍尔斯(Fredson Bowers)的《书目描述原则》(Principles of Bibliographical Description, 1949)进行了重大修订,并且独立存在,但我认为它不只是《书目描述原则》的替代品,而是该书的配套作品。毕竟,经典永远不会被完全取代,《原则》的许多具体段落和它所表现的态度永远值得一读:每一个细节都反映了描述性参考书目是一种历史学术形式的观点。没有人能在读完这本书后不明白,描述性参考书目不仅仅是识别第一版的指南(尽管它起到了这个作用),而是所采用的书籍的生产和出版的历史,从而对印刷和出版的更广泛的编年史做出贡献。然而,任何早于1949年的作品都可能需要一些调整,我的文章提供了对一些基本概念的重新思考和重新定义,特别是理想的拷贝、发行、状态和格式。我还提出了一个更简单、更合乎逻辑的系统,用于在整理公式中标注插入的叶子,并为描述纸张、类型、非凸版材料和出版商的装订提供了更详细的建议。鲍尔斯几乎没有评论的两个问题在我的两篇文章中得到了广泛的讨论:将参考书目分析的结果(即对排版和印刷的分析)纳入描述性参考书目,以及参考书目的总体组织所涉及的考虑(连同其条目的编号和检查副本的记录)。我一直试图比他更充分地表达在描述中包含每一个元素背后的基本原理,以及呈现这些特征的方式。(我对他和其他人提出的某些建议的详细批评,是为了在实践中说明这些基本原理。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信