Bayesian Failure Rate Estimation for the Reliability and Risk Assessment of Energy Pipelines

M. Dann, D. Lu, C. Dooley, Hassan Tayyab
{"title":"Bayesian Failure Rate Estimation for the Reliability and Risk Assessment of Energy Pipelines","authors":"M. Dann, D. Lu, C. Dooley, Hassan Tayyab","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Failure rates, which quantify the normalized likelihood of pipeline failure, are an integral part of assessing the reliability and risk of pipelines. The industry-wide trend of utilizing probabilistic methods for estimating failure rates raises the question whether the frequentist or Bayesian definition of probability is more suitable. The paper illustrates some limitations of the frequentist probability definition for pipeline risk assessment and supports the Bayesian approach for analyzing pipeline failure rates. The Bayesian quantification of probabilities leads to coherent uncertainty assessment and propagation even if evidence is combined from different sources either through a repetition of the prior-likelihood model or a multi-level / hierarchical approach that integrates all available data and information in one model. Selecting or disregarding data for estimating failure rates is no longer necessary as they all contribute to the result based on their relative uncertainties. Examples are provided in the paper to illustrate the benefits of the Bayesian probability approach.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure rates, which quantify the normalized likelihood of pipeline failure, are an integral part of assessing the reliability and risk of pipelines. The industry-wide trend of utilizing probabilistic methods for estimating failure rates raises the question whether the frequentist or Bayesian definition of probability is more suitable. The paper illustrates some limitations of the frequentist probability definition for pipeline risk assessment and supports the Bayesian approach for analyzing pipeline failure rates. The Bayesian quantification of probabilities leads to coherent uncertainty assessment and propagation even if evidence is combined from different sources either through a repetition of the prior-likelihood model or a multi-level / hierarchical approach that integrates all available data and information in one model. Selecting or disregarding data for estimating failure rates is no longer necessary as they all contribute to the result based on their relative uncertainties. Examples are provided in the paper to illustrate the benefits of the Bayesian probability approach.
能源管道可靠性与风险评估的贝叶斯故障率估计
故障率量化了管道故障的归一化可能性,是评估管道可靠性和风险的重要组成部分。利用概率方法估计故障率的整个行业趋势提出了一个问题,即概率的频率论定义和贝叶斯定义哪个更合适。本文阐述了频率概率定义在管道风险评估中的一些局限性,并支持贝叶斯方法分析管道故障率。概率的贝叶斯量化导致连贯的不确定性评估和传播,即使通过重复先验似然模型或将所有可用数据和信息集成到一个模型中的多层次/分层方法将来自不同来源的证据组合在一起。选择或忽略估计故障率的数据不再是必要的,因为它们都基于它们的相对不确定性来贡献结果。文中举例说明了贝叶斯概率方法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信