The Characteristics of Standard Instruments for Early Detection of Terrorism in the Name of Jihad in High School Students

Ahmad Ro'uf, Samsudi Samsudi, Zaim Elmubarok
{"title":"The Characteristics of Standard Instruments for Early Detection of Terrorism in the Name of Jihad in High School Students","authors":"Ahmad Ro'uf, Samsudi Samsudi, Zaim Elmubarok","doi":"10.15294/jere.v11i1.55419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radical religious understanding has become a horrendous phenomenon, because religion, especially Islam, does not teach radicalism or even terrorism. This study aims to (1) analyze the design of instruments for early detection, (2) analyze the characteristics of the standard’s instrument in the form of the level of instrument validity and (3) analyze the level of reliability on the instrument for early detection of terrorism in the name of jihad in students of SMA Negeri 2 Semarang. This research uses descriptive qualitative and quantitative research. The content validity of the instrument was tested by 3 experts. The statement items developed were tested on 30 respondents (small class) and 145 respondents (large class). Data was collected using interview techniques, documentation and questionnaires. The results of this study produced 45 standard instrument items for early detection of terrorism in the name of jihad in the form of a Likert scale of 1-4 and presented online using a google form. The results of validation by experts are that there are 14 items that are declared invalid or have an Aiken V index value of less than 0.3 so that these items must be discarded. The non-test instrument has an interrater reliability coefficient, a small class trial, and a large class trial, respectively, which is 0.88; 0.92; 0.91. There are 17 items that are invalid or less than the correlation coefficient rcount in the small class trial. Based on the large class trial, the final results of the valid items were 45 items with an r-count value greater than 0.1362 and a non-negative value. The results of the KMO in the field trial were 0.803 so that the instrument items could be analyzed further. The instrument is formed into 12 factors. The instrument developed is constructivly valid because it is able to explain the overall variation in the terrorism early detection instrument of 66.79%. The conclusion from this study is that the the non-test instrument in the form of a Likert scale. The characteristics standard’s instruments of early detection for terrorism in the name of jihad is constructivly valid and reliable.","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v11i1.55419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radical religious understanding has become a horrendous phenomenon, because religion, especially Islam, does not teach radicalism or even terrorism. This study aims to (1) analyze the design of instruments for early detection, (2) analyze the characteristics of the standard’s instrument in the form of the level of instrument validity and (3) analyze the level of reliability on the instrument for early detection of terrorism in the name of jihad in students of SMA Negeri 2 Semarang. This research uses descriptive qualitative and quantitative research. The content validity of the instrument was tested by 3 experts. The statement items developed were tested on 30 respondents (small class) and 145 respondents (large class). Data was collected using interview techniques, documentation and questionnaires. The results of this study produced 45 standard instrument items for early detection of terrorism in the name of jihad in the form of a Likert scale of 1-4 and presented online using a google form. The results of validation by experts are that there are 14 items that are declared invalid or have an Aiken V index value of less than 0.3 so that these items must be discarded. The non-test instrument has an interrater reliability coefficient, a small class trial, and a large class trial, respectively, which is 0.88; 0.92; 0.91. There are 17 items that are invalid or less than the correlation coefficient rcount in the small class trial. Based on the large class trial, the final results of the valid items were 45 items with an r-count value greater than 0.1362 and a non-negative value. The results of the KMO in the field trial were 0.803 so that the instrument items could be analyzed further. The instrument is formed into 12 factors. The instrument developed is constructivly valid because it is able to explain the overall variation in the terrorism early detection instrument of 66.79%. The conclusion from this study is that the the non-test instrument in the form of a Likert scale. The characteristics standard’s instruments of early detection for terrorism in the name of jihad is constructivly valid and reliable.
高中学生圣战恐怖主义早期检测标准仪器的特点
激进的宗教理解已经成为一种可怕的现象,因为宗教,尤其是伊斯兰教,并不教导激进主义甚至恐怖主义。本研究旨在(1)分析早期检测仪器的设计,(2)以仪器效度水平的形式分析标准仪器的特点,(3)分析SMA Negeri 2三宝朗学生对圣战恐怖主义早期检测仪器的信度水平。本研究采用描述性定性和定量研究相结合的方法。仪器的内容效度由3位专家进行检验。对30名小班受访者和145名大班受访者进行了测试。数据收集采用访谈技术,文件和问卷调查。这项研究的结果产生了45个标准工具项目,以1-4的李克特量表的形式,用于早期发现圣战名义下的恐怖主义,并使用谷歌表格在线呈现。专家验证的结果是有14个项目被宣布无效或Aiken V指标值小于0.3,必须丢弃。非检验仪器的互信度系数为0.88,小类试验为0.88,大类试验为0.88;0.92;0.91. 小班试验中无效或小于相关系数rcount的项目有17项。基于大班级试验,有效项目的最终结果为45个项目,r-count值大于0.1362且非负值。田间试验的KMO值为0.803,为进一步分析仪器项目奠定了基础。乐器由12个因素组成。所开发的仪器是建设性有效的,因为它能够解释66.79%的恐怖主义早期检测仪器的整体变化。本研究的结论是,非测试工具的形式是李克特量表。特征标准对以圣战为名的恐怖主义的早期检测工具具有建设性的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书