The entanglement of employers and political elites in migration policymaking: the case of Brexit and the revival of UK horticulture’s guestworker scheme

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
S. Scott
{"title":"The entanglement of employers and political elites in migration policymaking: the case of Brexit and the revival of UK horticulture’s guestworker scheme","authors":"S. Scott","doi":"10.1332/174426421x16445087491820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Following Brexit, and the ending of freedom of movement, labour supply crises have emerged in the UK. The paper focuses on the horticultural sector, where these crises have been particularly pronounced, with fears of crops being left to rot in the fields now commonplace.Aims and objectives: To examine the scale and nature of employer pressure on government with respect to UK low-wage migration policymaking in the period (2016–2020) following the Brexit vote.Methods: Thematic analysis of five parliamentary inquiries over the 2016–2020 Brexit period covering 515 documents and amounting to a total of 4,227 pages of evidence.Findings: Numerous political inquiries emerged after the 2016 Brexit referendum that opened up the opportunity for employers to publicly press government for more liberal low-wage migration policies. Employers responded with concerted, weighty and consistent pressure that revolved around: emphasising a labour supply crisis; underlining the lack of suitable local labour; presenting government with a range of unsavoury alternatives to low-wage immigration; and championing a new seasonal guestworker scheme to avoid these unsavoury alternatives.Discussion and conclusions: The Brexit period (2016–2020) saw a willingness within UK government to listen to employers with respect to migration policy. In the food production industry, employers responded with a strong and consistent voice and they got what they wanted: a new horticultural guestworker scheme. We cannot say for certain though that correlation equals causation, and more research is now needed into the intimate entanglement of employers and political elites in the migration policy process.Key messagesBrexit created a low-wage labour supply crisis in UK horticulture, according to employers.Employers were given extensive opportunity to pressure government about this in the 2016–2020 Brexit period.Reviewing documentary evidence from employers, the paper shows pressure to be concerted, weighty and consistent.Employer pressure is correlated with a new seasonal guestworker visa scheme for UK horticulture.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16445087491820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Following Brexit, and the ending of freedom of movement, labour supply crises have emerged in the UK. The paper focuses on the horticultural sector, where these crises have been particularly pronounced, with fears of crops being left to rot in the fields now commonplace.Aims and objectives: To examine the scale and nature of employer pressure on government with respect to UK low-wage migration policymaking in the period (2016–2020) following the Brexit vote.Methods: Thematic analysis of five parliamentary inquiries over the 2016–2020 Brexit period covering 515 documents and amounting to a total of 4,227 pages of evidence.Findings: Numerous political inquiries emerged after the 2016 Brexit referendum that opened up the opportunity for employers to publicly press government for more liberal low-wage migration policies. Employers responded with concerted, weighty and consistent pressure that revolved around: emphasising a labour supply crisis; underlining the lack of suitable local labour; presenting government with a range of unsavoury alternatives to low-wage immigration; and championing a new seasonal guestworker scheme to avoid these unsavoury alternatives.Discussion and conclusions: The Brexit period (2016–2020) saw a willingness within UK government to listen to employers with respect to migration policy. In the food production industry, employers responded with a strong and consistent voice and they got what they wanted: a new horticultural guestworker scheme. We cannot say for certain though that correlation equals causation, and more research is now needed into the intimate entanglement of employers and political elites in the migration policy process.Key messagesBrexit created a low-wage labour supply crisis in UK horticulture, according to employers.Employers were given extensive opportunity to pressure government about this in the 2016–2020 Brexit period.Reviewing documentary evidence from employers, the paper shows pressure to be concerted, weighty and consistent.Employer pressure is correlated with a new seasonal guestworker visa scheme for UK horticulture.
雇主和政治精英在移民政策制定中的纠缠:以英国退欧和英国园艺客工计划的复兴为例
背景:在英国脱欧和流动自由结束后,英国出现了劳动力供应危机。这篇论文关注的是园艺部门,在这个领域,这些危机尤为明显,人们对农作物在田间腐烂的担忧现在已经司空见惯。目的和目标:研究英国脱欧公投后(2016-2020年)英国低工资移民政策制定方面雇主对政府压力的规模和性质。方法:对2016-2020年英国脱欧期间的五次议会调查进行专题分析,涉及515份文件,共计4227页证据。调查结果:2016年英国脱欧公投后,出现了许多政治调查,这为雇主公开向政府施压,要求政府采取更自由的低工资移民政策提供了机会。雇主们以一致的、沉重的、持续的压力回应,这些压力围绕着:强调劳动力供应危机;强调缺乏合适的本地劳动力;向政府提出一系列令人讨厌的替代低工资移民的方案;并倡导一项新的季节性客工计划,以避免这些令人讨厌的替代方案。讨论和结论:英国脱欧期间(2016-2020年),英国政府内部愿意听取雇主在移民政策方面的意见。在食品生产行业,雇主们发出了强烈而一致的声音,他们得到了他们想要的:一个新的园艺客工计划。然而,我们不能肯定地说相关性等于因果关系,现在需要对雇主和政治精英在移民政策过程中的密切纠缠进行更多的研究。雇主们表示,英国脱欧造成了英国园艺业的低工资劳动力供应危机。在2016-2020年英国脱欧期间,雇主获得了广泛的机会向政府施压。在回顾了雇主提供的书面证据后,这份报告显示了协调一致、有分量和一致的压力。雇主压力与英国园艺业一项新的季节性客工签证计划有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信