“I love this photo, I can feel their hearts!” How users across the world evaluate social media portraiture

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
T. Trillò, Blake Hallinan, Avishai Green, Bumsoo Kim, Saki Mizoroki, Rebecca Scharlach, Pyung Hwa Park, P. Frosh, L. Shifman
{"title":"“I love this photo, I can feel their hearts!” How users across the world evaluate social media portraiture","authors":"T. Trillò, Blake Hallinan, Avishai Green, Bumsoo Kim, Saki Mizoroki, Rebecca Scharlach, Pyung Hwa Park, P. Frosh, L. Shifman","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqad009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Portraits on social media are value-laden constructs. Whether documenting graduation or flexing in the gym, users express what they care about and present it for others to evaluate. Since “global” portrait genres are produced and consumed in different locales, their interpretation and evaluation may vary. We thus ask: What values do people identify in different types of social media portraits? Which evaluative criteria do they use when judging them? An analysis of 100 interviews with users from Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and the United States reveals that people consistently recognize genre-specific values in portraits and evaluate them through a narrow set of communication-related criteria. Such evaluations vary across cultures in ways that only occasionally match established comparative literature on values. We reflect on the relational character of the criteria adopted for the evaluation of portraits worldwide, highlighting its association with new modes of sociability in digital spheres.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Portraits on social media are value-laden constructs. Whether documenting graduation or flexing in the gym, users express what they care about and present it for others to evaluate. Since “global” portrait genres are produced and consumed in different locales, their interpretation and evaluation may vary. We thus ask: What values do people identify in different types of social media portraits? Which evaluative criteria do they use when judging them? An analysis of 100 interviews with users from Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and the United States reveals that people consistently recognize genre-specific values in portraits and evaluate them through a narrow set of communication-related criteria. Such evaluations vary across cultures in ways that only occasionally match established comparative literature on values. We reflect on the relational character of the criteria adopted for the evaluation of portraits worldwide, highlighting its association with new modes of sociability in digital spheres.
“我喜欢这张照片,我能感受到他们的心!”世界各地的用户如何评价社交媒体的形象
社交媒体上的画像是承载着价值的结构。无论是记录毕业典礼还是在健身房做伸展运动,用户都会表达出他们所关心的东西,并将其呈现给他人来评估。由于“全球”肖像流派是在不同地区生产和消费的,因此它们的解释和评价可能会有所不同。因此,我们要问:人们在不同类型的社交媒体肖像中认同哪些价值观?他们用什么评价标准来评判他们?对来自德国、意大利、日本、韩国和美国的100位用户的采访分析显示,人们始终认识到肖像的特定类型价值,并通过一套狭隘的与交流相关的标准来评估它们。这种评价在不同的文化中各不相同,只是偶尔与已建立的价值观比较文献相匹配。我们反思了世界范围内评价肖像所采用的标准的关系特征,强调了它与数字领域社交新模式的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信