HEALTH PLANNING THEORIES AND TOBACCO CONTROL PROGRAMMES: A REVIEW

D. Raj, M. Norain, M. Najib, A. Rosliza
{"title":"HEALTH PLANNING THEORIES AND TOBACCO CONTROL PROGRAMMES: A REVIEW","authors":"D. Raj, M. Norain, M. Najib, A. Rosliza","doi":"10.32827/ijphcs.6.3.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  The most common health planning theories described by literature reviews are rationalism, incrementalism, and mixed- scanning. The application of planning theories in health planning is essential to give planners a broader perspective and to ensure the aims of their programmes are achievable.  Tobacco control programme is among the health programmes that has been well established at an international level whereby The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and MPOWER package have served as a guide to the WHO member countries. However, the planning process of tobacco control programmes of each country are made based on further justifications and current situations of the respective countries. Marked differences in health planning theory approaches can be seen among low, middle and high income countries during the planning of tobacco programmes. Materials and Methods: A scoping review was done using online databases by choosing the most common health planning theories used and mentioned in literature reviews. With the exception of Antarctica, several low, middle and high income countries with comprehensive information on tobacco control programmes were taken as representatives. Search for articles were conducted via four major databases including Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PubMed with additional information from guidelines and expert reports from official websites. Result:  The three most common theories used in health planning are rationalism, incrementalism, and mix scanning. Differences in the application of these theories are seen among low, middle and high income countries. Rationalism and mixed scanning theory were mostly applicable in high and middle income countries whereas incrementalism is mostly being used in LIC. Conclusion:  The application of health planning theories in tobacco control program may differ depending on factors that influence the planning process mainly the economic and political factors as well as support from key players. Keywords:  planning theories, planning characteristics, tobacco control program planning","PeriodicalId":14315,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.3.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The most common health planning theories described by literature reviews are rationalism, incrementalism, and mixed- scanning. The application of planning theories in health planning is essential to give planners a broader perspective and to ensure the aims of their programmes are achievable.  Tobacco control programme is among the health programmes that has been well established at an international level whereby The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and MPOWER package have served as a guide to the WHO member countries. However, the planning process of tobacco control programmes of each country are made based on further justifications and current situations of the respective countries. Marked differences in health planning theory approaches can be seen among low, middle and high income countries during the planning of tobacco programmes. Materials and Methods: A scoping review was done using online databases by choosing the most common health planning theories used and mentioned in literature reviews. With the exception of Antarctica, several low, middle and high income countries with comprehensive information on tobacco control programmes were taken as representatives. Search for articles were conducted via four major databases including Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PubMed with additional information from guidelines and expert reports from official websites. Result:  The three most common theories used in health planning are rationalism, incrementalism, and mix scanning. Differences in the application of these theories are seen among low, middle and high income countries. Rationalism and mixed scanning theory were mostly applicable in high and middle income countries whereas incrementalism is mostly being used in LIC. Conclusion:  The application of health planning theories in tobacco control program may differ depending on factors that influence the planning process mainly the economic and political factors as well as support from key players. Keywords:  planning theories, planning characteristics, tobacco control program planning
健康规划理论与烟草控制规划:综述
背景:文献综述中描述的最常见的健康规划理论有理性主义、渐进主义和混合扫描。在保健规划中应用规划理论对于使规划人员有更广阔的视野和确保其方案的目标能够实现至关重要。烟草控制规划是在国际一级已确立的卫生规划之一,《烟草控制框架公约》和MPOWER一揽子计划已成为卫生组织成员国的指南。然而,每个国家烟草控制规划的规划过程是根据进一步的理由和各自国家的现状来制定的。在规划烟草规划期间,在低收入、中等收入和高收入国家之间可以看到卫生规划理论方法的显著差异。材料和方法:通过选择文献综述中使用和提到的最常见的健康计划理论,使用在线数据库进行范围审查。除南极洲外,有关于烟草控制方案的全面资料的几个低、中、高收入国家作为代表出席了会议。文章的搜索通过四大数据库进行,包括Scopus、Science Direct、Google Scholar和PubMed,其他信息来自官方网站的指南和专家报告。结果:健康规划中最常用的三种理论是理性主义、渐进主义和混合扫描。这些理论的应用在低收入、中等收入和高收入国家之间存在差异。理性主义和混合扫描理论主要适用于中高收入国家,而增量主义主要适用于低收入国家。结论:健康规划理论在控烟规划中的应用可能取决于影响规划过程的因素,主要是经济和政治因素以及关键参与者的支持。关键词:规划理论,规划特点,控烟规划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信