An An Analysis of Authentic Assessment Implementation in English Speaking Skill of Second Grade Students

S. Syafrizal, John Paharnzah, Frasasti Wahyu Nuraeni
{"title":"An An Analysis of Authentic Assessment Implementation in English Speaking Skill of Second Grade Students","authors":"S. Syafrizal, John Paharnzah, Frasasti Wahyu Nuraeni","doi":"10.15294/jere.v9i2.38842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a qualitative study which aimed at finding the result of authentic assessment implementation in assessing student English speaking skill. The data were analyzed using content analysis approach. The result of the study showed that the students in their speaking practice got various score in each category. In fluency category, there were five students or 16.67% got 5 score. It meant the student’s fluency and their volume is better. It was smooth and fluid speech. There were few or no hesitations and also there were not attempts to search for words. In pronunciation and accent category, the students who got 5 score was only two students or 7% which their pronunciation is excellent. They had good effort at accent like native. In vocabulary category, the students who got 5 score was 11 students or 37%. It meant their language control was excellent and there was a wide range of well-chosen vocabulary. In grammar category, there were only one student or 3.33% got 5 score. His/her grammatical structures are accuracy and variety. The last category was details which 16 students 53.33% got 5 score. It meant that their level of description was excellent. Additional details information beyond the required included. In the process of conducting evaluation, authentic assessment has big enough influence especially in assessing students’ speaking skill.","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v9i2.38842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper is a qualitative study which aimed at finding the result of authentic assessment implementation in assessing student English speaking skill. The data were analyzed using content analysis approach. The result of the study showed that the students in their speaking practice got various score in each category. In fluency category, there were five students or 16.67% got 5 score. It meant the student’s fluency and their volume is better. It was smooth and fluid speech. There were few or no hesitations and also there were not attempts to search for words. In pronunciation and accent category, the students who got 5 score was only two students or 7% which their pronunciation is excellent. They had good effort at accent like native. In vocabulary category, the students who got 5 score was 11 students or 37%. It meant their language control was excellent and there was a wide range of well-chosen vocabulary. In grammar category, there were only one student or 3.33% got 5 score. His/her grammatical structures are accuracy and variety. The last category was details which 16 students 53.33% got 5 score. It meant that their level of description was excellent. Additional details information beyond the required included. In the process of conducting evaluation, authentic assessment has big enough influence especially in assessing students’ speaking skill.
二年级学生英语口语能力真实性评价实施分析
本文是一项定性研究,旨在寻找真实的评估实施结果,以评估学生的英语口语能力。采用内容分析法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,学生在口语练习中,在各个类别中都得到了不同的分数。在流利性方面,有5名学生得到5分,占16.67%。这意味着学生们的口语流利度和音量都提高了。这是流畅流畅的演讲。很少或根本没有犹豫,也没有试图寻找词语。在发音和口音方面,得到5分的学生只有2名,占7%。他们很努力地模仿当地人的口音。在词汇方面,得到5分的学生占37%,占11人。这意味着他们的语言控制能力很好,有很多精心挑选的词汇。在语法类别中,只有1名学生得到5分,占3.33%。他/她的语法结构准确多样。最后一个类别是细节,有16名学生获得5分,占53.33%。这意味着他们的描述水平非常好。额外的详细信息,超出所需的包括。在进行评估的过程中,真实的评估有足够大的影响,特别是在评估学生的口语能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书